Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30211003›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

Towards patient-specific modeling of brain tumor growth and formation of secondary nodes guided by DTI-MRI.

Stelios Angeli, Kyrre E Emblem, Paulina Due-Tonnessen, Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03458455 (Improved Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Brain Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03458455 unknown statusnot on this map

Improved Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Brain Tumors

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOslo University HospitalRan2013 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsBrain MetastasesArmsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stelios AngeliCancer Biophysics laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Kyrre E EmblemDepartment of Diagnostic Physics, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Paulina Due-TonnessenDepartment of Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Triantafyllos StylianopoulosCancer Biophysics laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. Electronic address: tstylian@ucy.ac.cy.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Cyprus · CY

Funding

European Research Council 336839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies to simulate brain tumor progression, often investigate either temporal changes in cancer cell density or the overall tissue-level growth of the tumor mass. Here, we developed a computational model to bridge these two approaches. The model incorporates the tumor biomechanical response at the tissue level and accounts for cellular events by modeling cancer cell proliferation, infiltration to surrounding tissues, and invasion to distant locations. Moreover, acquisition of high resolution human data from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging and perfusion imaging was employed within the simulations towards a realistic and patient specific model. The model predicted the intratumoral mechanical stresses to range from 20 to 34 kPa, which caused an up to 4.5 mm displacement to the adjacent healthy tissue. Furthermore, the model predicted plausible cancer cell invasion patterns within the brain along the white matter fiber tracts. Finally, by varying the tumor vascular density and its invasive outer ring thickness, our model showed the potential of these parameters for guiding the timing (83-90 days) of cancer cell distant invasion as well as the number (0-2 sites) and location (temportal and/or parietal lobe) of the invasion sites.

Indexed as

AdultBrain NeoplasmsDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineTumor BurdenTumor MicroenvironmentBiomechanicsBrainDTI-MRIGlioblastomaTumor distant invasionTumor growthTumor perfusion

Identifiers

PMID30211003
PMCPMC6134360
OpenAlexW2889167864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.