Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30210964›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2018

Treatment of Atlas Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU).

Frank Kandziora, Matti Scholz, Andreas Pingel, Philipp Schleicher, Ulas Yildiz, Patrick Kluger, Matthias Pumberger, Andreas Korge, Klaus John Schnake, Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Initial fracture gap distance as a potential quantitative predictor for atlas fracture nonunion: A preliminary retrospective analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. A Case Report of an Unstable C-spine Fracture in the Emergency Department.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Jefferson Fracture and the Classification System for Atlas Fractures, A Case Report.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epidemiology and management of atlas fractures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frank KandzioraBG Unfallklinik Frankfurt/Main gGmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Matti ScholzBG Unfallklinik Frankfurt/Main gGmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Andreas PingelBG Unfallklinik Frankfurt/Main gGmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Philipp SchleicherBG Unfallklinik Frankfurt/Main gGmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ulas YildizBG Unfallklinik Frankfurt/Main gGmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Patrick KlugerClinic for Orthopedics, Erbach, Germany.
Matthias PumbergerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas KorgeSchön Kliniken München Harlachingen, Munich, Germany.
Klaus John SchnakeSchön Kliniken Nürnberg/Fürth, Fürth, Germany.
Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designNarrative review and expert recommendation.

objectivesTo establish treatment recommendations for atlas fractures based on the knowledge of the experts of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma.

methodsNeither high-level evidence studies comparing conservative and operative management nor studies matching different operative treatment strategies exist. This recommendation summarizes the knowledge of the experts of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma with regard to the treatment of atlas fractures.

resultsMost atlas fractures are the result of compression forces. A valuable morphological classification system has been described by Gehweiler. For an adequate diagnosis, a computed tomography is mandatory. To distinguish between stable and unstable type 3 injuries, it is necessary to evaluate the integrity of the transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) with magnetic resonance imaging and to classify the TAL lesions. The majority of atlas fractures are stable and will be successfully managed conservatively. Unstable atlas fractures (type 3b and sagittal split type 4 fractures) should be treated by surgical stabilization. Unstable atlas fractures (type 3b) with a midsubstance ligamentous disruption or severely dislocated ligamentous bony avulsions of the TAL can successfully be treated by a C1/2 fusion. Unstable atlas fractures (type 3b) with a moderately dislocated ligamentous bony avulsion of the TAL and sagittal split type 4 fractures may be treated by atlas osteosynthesis only.

conclusionsWhereas the majority of atlas fractures can be managed conservatively, in specific fracture patterns surgical treatment strategies have become the standard of care.

Indexed as

atlasatlas osteosynthesisaxial compressionC1C1/2 fusioncervical spinefractureinjuryinstabilitysurgerytransverse atlantal ligament (TAL)

Identifiers

PMID30210964
PMCPMC6130103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.