Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30210933›Full record

ArticlePLoS currents2018

Vulnerabilities Associated with Post-disaster Declines in HIV-testing: Decomposing the Impact of Hurricane Sandy.

Erin Thomas, Linda Ekperi, Tanya Telfair LeBlanc, Erica Elaine Adams, Grete E Wilt, Noelle-Angelique Molinari, Eric G Carbone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS currents, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erin ThomasCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Office of the Director, Office of Science and Public Health Practice (OSPHP).
Linda EkperiCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness, Applied Science and Evaluation Branch (ASEB).
Tanya Telfair LeBlancCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness, Applied Science and Evaluation Branch (ASEB).
Erica Elaine AdamsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of the Director, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Geospatial Research, Analysis, and Services Program (GRASP).
Grete E WiltCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of the Director, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Geospatial Research, Analysis, and Services Program (GRASP).
Noelle-Angelique MolinariCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Division of State and Local Readiness, Applied Science and Evaluation Branch (ASEB).
Eric G CarboneCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Office of the Director, Office of Science and Public Health Practice (OSPHP).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUsing Interrupted Time Series Analysis and generalized estimating equations, this study identifies factors that influence the size and significance of Hurricane Sandy's estimated impact on HIV testing in 90 core-based statistical areas from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013.

methodsGeneralized estimating equations were used to examine the effects of sociodemographic and storm-related variables on relative change in HIV testing resulting from Interrupted Time Series analyses.

resultsThere is a significant negative relationship between HIV prevalence and the relative change in testing at all time periods. A one unit increase in HIV prevalence corresponds to a 35% decrease in relative testing the week of the storm and a 14% decrease in relative testing at week twelve. Building loss was also negatively associated with relative change for all time points. For example, a one unit increase in building loss at week 0 corresponds with an 8% decrease in the relative change in testing (p=0.0001) and a 2% at week twelve (p=0.001). DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate that HIV testing can be negatively affected during public health emergencies. Communities with high percentages of building loss and significant HIV disease burden should prioritize resumption of testing to support HIV prevention.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.