Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30210462›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2018

Emergent Properties of Microbial Activity in Heterogeneous Soil Microenvironments: Different Research Approaches Are Slowly Converging, Yet Major Challenges Remain.

Philippe C Baveye, Wilfred Otten, Alexandra Kravchenko, María Balseiro-Romero, Éléonore Beckers, Maha Chalhoub, Christophe Darnault, Thilo Eickhorst, Patricia Garnier, Simona Hapca and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Philippe C BaveyeUMR ECOSYS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Thiverval-Grignon, rance.
Wilfred OttenSchool of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom.
Alexandra KravchenkoDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
María Balseiro-RomeroUMR ECOSYS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Thiverval-Grignon, rance.
Éléonore BeckersSoil-Water-Plant Exchanges, Terra Research Centre, BIOSE, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium.
Maha ChalhoubUMR ECOSYS, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, Thiverval-Grignon, France.
Christophe DarnaultLaboratory of Hydrogeoscience and Biological Engineering, L.G. Rich Environmental Laboratory, Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Thilo EickhorstFaculty 2 Biology/Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Patricia GarnierUMR ECOSYS, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, Thiverval-Grignon, France.
Simona HapcaDundee Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Serkan KiranyazDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Olivier MongaInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, Bondy, France.
Carsten W MuellerLehrstuhl für Bodenkunde, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Naoise NunanInstitute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences - Paris, Sorbonne Universités, CNRS, IRD, INRA, P7, UPEC, Paris, France.
Valérie PotUMR ECOSYS, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, Thiverval-Grignon, France.
Steffen SchlüterSoil System Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Hannes SchmidtTerrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Research Network 'Chemistry meets Microbiology', University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hans-Jörg VogelSoil System Science, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 60 years, soil microbiologists have accumulated a wealth of experimental data showing that the bulk, macroscopic parameters (e.g., granulometry, pH, soil organic matter, and biomass contents) commonly used to characterize soils provide insufficient information to describe quantitatively the activity of soil microorganisms and some of its outcomes, like the emission of greenhouse gasses. Clearly, new, more appropriate macroscopic parameters are needed, which reflect better the spatial heterogeneity of soils at the microscale (i.e., the pore scale) that is commensurate with the habitat of many microorganisms. For a long time, spectroscopic and microscopic tools were lacking to quantify processes at that scale, but major technological advances over the last 15 years have made suitable equipment available to researchers. In this context, the objective of the present article is to review progress achieved to date in the significant research program that has ensued. This program can be rationalized as a sequence of steps, namely the quantification and modeling of the physical-, (bio)chemical-, and microbiological properties of soils, the integration of these different perspectives into a unified theory, its upscaling to the macroscopic scale, and, eventually, the development of new approaches to measure macroscopic soil characteristics. At this stage, significant progress has been achieved on the physical front, and to a lesser extent on the (bio)chemical one as well, both in terms of experiments and modeling. With regard to the microbial aspects, although a lot of work has been devoted to the modeling of bacterial and fungal activity in soils at the pore scale, the appropriateness of model assumptions cannot be readily assessed because of the scarcity of relevant experimental data. For significant progress to be made, it is crucial to make sure that research on the microbial components of soil systems does not keep lagging behind the work on the physical and (bio)chemical characteristics. Concerning the subsequent steps in the program, very little integration of the various disciplinary perspectives has occurred so far, and, as a result, researchers have not yet been able to tackle the scaling up to the macroscopic level. Many challenges, some of them daunting, remain on the path ahead. Fortunately, a number of these challenges may be resolved by brand new measuring equipment that will become commercially available in the very near future.

Indexed as

biodiversityNanoSIMS imagingsingle-cell genomicssoil microbiologytomographyupscalingX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID30210462
PMCPMC6119716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.