ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
The Australian Sheep-Goat Scale: An Evaluation of Factor Structure and Convergent Validity.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Paranormal beliefs and cognitive function: A systematic review and assessment of study quality across four decades of research.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- The Relationship Between Illusory Health Beliefs, Recommended Health Behaviours, and Complementary and Alternative Medicine: An Investigation Across Multiple Time Points.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Illusory Health Beliefs Scale: validation using exploratory structural equation modeling and multidimensional Rasch analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Paranormal belief and conspiracy theory endorsement: variations in adaptive function and positive wellbeing.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The paranormal health beliefs scale: an evaluation using cognitive interviewing.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Re-evaluation of the relationship between paranormal belief and perceived stress using statistical modelling.PloS one · 2024Article
- The Illusory Health Beliefs Scale: preliminary validation using exploratory factor and Rasch analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Self-Ascribed Paranormal Ability: Reflexive Thematic Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Paranormal belief and well-being: The moderating roles of transliminality and psychopathology-related facets.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Longitudinal assessment of the temporal stability and predictive validity of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Development of the Paranormal and Supernatural Beliefs Scale using classical and modern test theory.BMC psychology · 2021Article
- Paranormal Experience Profiles and Their Association With Variations in Executive Functions: A Latent Profile Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Paranormal Belief, Thinking Style and Delusion Formation: A Latent Profile Analysis of Within-Individual Variations in Experience-Based Paranormal Facets.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Differences in Cognitive-Perceptual Factors Arising From Variations in Self-Professed Paranormal Ability.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Pseudoscientific beliefs and psychopathological risks increase after COVID-19 social quarantine.Globalization and health · 2020Article
- Article
- An Evaluation of the Belief in Science Scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Australian Sheep-Goat Scale (ASGS) is a commonly used measure of belief in the paranormal. The scale contains items that index extrasensory perception (ESP), psychokinesis (PK), and life after death (LAD). Although, research employs the ASGS as both a general (unidimensional) and factorial (multidimensional) measure, few studies have examined the appropriateness of these solutions. Accordingly, the present paper tested the psychometric integrity of the ASGS via two studies. Study 1 assessed ASGS factorial structure using confirmatory factor analysis. To achieve this, merging of ASGS data from previously published studies and ongoing work created a heterogeneous sample of 1,601 responses. Analysis revealed that a two-factor bifactor model best explained ASGS organization. This comprised a general overarching factor incorporating two subfactors (ESP and PK). Factor loadings and omega reliability supported a unidimensional structure for the most part. Removal of LAD items improved model fit because the factor added unnecessary complexity and undermined scale psychometric integrity. Study 2, using a supplementary composite sample of 320 respondents, assessed the convergent validity of the emergent ASGS model against a recently published Revised Paranormal Belief Scale (RPBS) bifactor solution. Comparison revealed high convergent validity. The general ASGS factor, despite deriving from only psi-related dimensions (ESP and PK) predicted RPBS scores. This finding indicated that ASGS brevity relative to the RPBS is advantageous when assessing general belief in the paranormal. The ASGS, notwithstanding limited construct content, functions as an effective measure of paranormal belief. Additionally, Study 2 replicated the bifactor structure identified in Study 1 and invariance testing supported invariance of form, factor loadings and item intercepts for this solution across Studies 1 and 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.