Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30210309›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2018

Attention Configures Synchronization Within Local Neuronal Networks for Processing of the Behaviorally Relevant Stimulus.

Eric Drebitz, Marcus Haag, Iris Grothe, Sunita Mandon, Andreas K Kreiter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transient Oscillations of Neural Firing Rate Associated With Routing of Evidence in a Perceptual Decision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Adaptive behaviour and learning in slime moulds: the role of oscillations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Visual Stimulus Content in V4 Is Conveyed by Gamma-Rhythmic Information Packages.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric DrebitzCenter for Cognitive Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Marcus HaagCenter for Cognitive Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Iris GrotheCenter for Cognitive Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Sunita MandonCenter for Cognitive Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Andreas K KreiterCenter for Cognitive Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for fast and dynamic processing of relevant information imposes high demands onto the flexibility and efficiency of the nervous system. A good example for such flexibility is the attention-dependent selection of relevant sensory information. Studies investigating attentional modulations of neuronal responses to simultaneously arriving input showed that neurons respond, as if only the attended stimulus would be present within their receptive fields (RF). However, attention also improves neuronal representation and behavioral performance, when only one stimulus is present. Thus, attention serves for selecting relevant input and changes the neuronal processing of signals representing selected stimuli, ultimately leading to a more efficient behavioral performance. Here, we tested the hypothesis that attention configures the strength of functional coupling between a local neuronal network's neurons specifically for effective processing of signals representing attended stimuli. This coupling is measured as the strength of γ-synchronization between these neurons. The hypothesis predicts that the pattern of synchronization in local networks should depend on which stimulus is attended. Furthermore, we expect this pattern to be similar for the attended stimulus presented alone or together with irrelevant stimuli in the RF. To test these predictions, we recorded spiking-activity and local field potentials (LFP) with closely spaced electrodes in area V4 of monkeys performing a demanding attention task. Our results show that the γ-band phase coherence (γ-PhC) between spiking-activity and the LFP, as well as the spiking-activity of two groups of neurons, strongly depended on which of the two stimuli in the RF was attended. The γ-PhC was almost identical for the attended stimulus presented either alone or together with a distractor. The functional relevance of dynamic γ-band synchronization is further supported by the observation of strongly degraded γ-PhC before behavioral errors, while firing rates were barely affected. These qualitatively different results point toward a failure of attention-dependent top-down mechanisms to correctly synchronize the local neuronal network in V4, even though this network receives the correctly selected input. These findings support the idea of a flexible, demand-dependent dynamic configuration of local neuronal networks, for performing different functions, even on the same sensory input.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAttentionCortical SynchronizationEvoked Potentials, VisualMacaca mulattaMalePhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual Perceptionarea V4dynamic assembly formationfunctional couplinggamma-bandmacaque monkeyneuronal network configurationspatial selective attentionvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID30210309
PMCPMC6123385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.