Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209796›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2019

A matched cohort study of radio-chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in soft tissue sarcoma patients.

Daniela Greto, Mauro Loi, Francesca Terziani, Luca Visani, Pietro Garlatti, Monica Lo Russo, Ausilia Teriaca, Cristina Muntoni, Camilla Delli Paoli, Juliana Topulli and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Daniela GretoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy. daniela.greto@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-0841
Mauro LoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Francesca TerzianiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Luca VisaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Pietro GarlattiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Monica Lo RussoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Ausilia TeriacaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Cristina MuntoniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Camilla Delli PaoliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Juliana TopulliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Domenico CampanacciDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giovanni BeltramiDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Guido ScocciantiDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Pierluigi BonomoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Isacco DesideriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Giulio FrancoliniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo LiviDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50141, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdjuvant radiotherapy is the standard postoperative treatment after conservative surgery in high risk soft tissue sarcoma. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy is still debated. Therefore, a matched cohort analysis was performed in high risk soft tissue patients to analyse differences in terms of clinical outcome and toxicity between patients treated with concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RTCT) and radiotherapy (RT) alone. MATERIALS AND

methodsFor each patient in RT group was selected a patient in the RTCT group matching for age, T stage and grading. Acute and late toxicity were recorded, overall survival, recurrence free survival and distant metastases free survival were analysed and compared between the two groups.

resultsNinety patients were selected, half of patients underwent radio-chemotherapy and half received radiotherapy alone. During the treatment Grade 3 dermatitis was recorded in 15 (16.7%) patients, 6 (6.7%) patients associated chemotherapy and during follow up 12 (13.3%) patients developed grade 2 late fibrosis, 3 (3.3%) joint stiffness and 1 (1.1%) patient experienced a bone fracture. There were no differences in the rate of acute and late toxicity between RTCT and RT alone group. Nineteen (21.1%) patients developed local recurrence, overall 5-year local relapse free survival was 83%. There were no differences between the two groups. 29 patients developed distant metastases, 14 (15.6%) patients in the RTCT group and 15 (16.7%) patients in the RT group. The 5-year distant metastases free survival was 67%. Age > 65 years was the only independent factor affecting distant recurrence (HR = 5.7, 95% CI 2.7-11.9; p = 0.001). At the time of analysis 15 (16.7%) patients were dead, 6 (6.7%) patients in the RTCT group and 9 (10%) patients in the RT group. 5-years overall survival was: 88%. At multivariate analysis age > 65 years was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (HR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.2-12.1, p = 0.037).

conclusionsProspective randomized studies with large size population and with subgroup analysis for histological subtypes are necessary to clarify the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma patients. Tailored treatment has to be considered in elderly soft tissue patients to guarantee a better outcome in this high risk and fragile population.

Indexed as

AgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRisk FactorsSarcomaSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeChemotherapyRadio-chemotherapyRadiotherapySoft tissue sarcomaToxicity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.