Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209771›Full record

ArticleMycotoxin research2019

A critical evaluation of health risk assessment of modified mycotoxins with a special focus on zearalenone.

Nicole Lorenz, Sven Dänicke, Lutz Edler, Christoph Gottschalk, Eva Lassek, Doris Marko, Michael Rychlik, Angela Mally

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Mycotoxin research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Urinary mycoestrogens and gestational weight gain in the UPSIDE pregnancy cohort.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mycotoxins in Tea ((Toxins · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole LorenzGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany. Nicole.Lorenz@bfr.bund.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5149-4651
Sven DänickeInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute (FLI), Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Bundesallee 50, 38116, Braunschweig, Germany.
Lutz EdlerDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph GottschalkChair of Food Safety, Veterinary Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Schönleutnerstr. 8, 85764, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Eva LassekBavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Luitpoldstr. 1, 97082, Würzburg, Germany.
Doris MarkoDepartment of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Währingerstr. 38, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Michael RychlikChair of Analytical Food Chemistry, Technical University Munich, Alte Akademie 10, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Angela MallyDepartment of Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Versbacher Strasse 9, 97078, Würzburg, Germany.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Vienna · ATUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comprehensive definition introducing the term "modified mycotoxins" to encompass all possible forms in which mycotoxins and their modifications can occur was recently proposed and has rapidly gained wide acceptance within the scientific community. It is becoming increasingly evident that exposure to such modified mycotoxins due to their presence in food and feed has the potential to pose a substantial additional risk to human and animal health. Zearalenone (ZEN) is a well-characterized Fusarium toxin. Considering the diversity of modified forms of ZEN occurring in food and feed, the toxicologically relevant endocrine activity of many of these metabolites, and the fact that modified forms add to a dietary exposure which approaches the tolerable daily intake by free ZEN alone, modified forms of ZEN present an ideal case study for critical evaluation of modified mycotoxins in food safety. Following a summary of recent scientific opinions of EFSA dealing with health risk assessment of ZEN alone or in combination with its modified forms, uncertainties and data gaps are highlighted. Issues essential for evaluation and prioritization of modified mycotoxins in health risk assessment are identified and discussed, including opportunities to improve exposure assessment using biomonitoring data. Further issues such as future consideration of combinatory effects of the parent toxin with its modified forms and also other compounds co-occurring in food and feed are addressed. With a particular focus on ZEN, the most pressing challenges associated with health risk assessment of modified mycotoxins are identified and recommendations for further research to fill data gaps and reduce uncertainties are made.

Indexed as

Food SafetyAnimal FeedAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFood ContaminationFusariumHumansMycotoxinsRisk AssessmentZearalenoneMycotoxinsZearalenoneBiomonitoringCombinatory effectsHealth risk assessmentModified mycotoxinsZearalenone

Identifiers

PMID30209771
PMCPMC6331505
OpenAlexW2890854974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.