Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209752›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2019

Information exchange between patients with Lynch syndrome and their genetic and non-genetic health professionals: whose responsibility?

Kirsten F L Douma, Fonnet E Bleeker, Niki M Medendorp, Emmelyn A J Croes, Ellen M A Smets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirsten F L DoumaDepartment of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. k.f.douma@amc.uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3428-5238
Fonnet E BleekerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niki M MedendorpDepartment of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Emmelyn A J CroesDepartment Communication and Information Sciences, Tilburg University School of Humanities, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Ellen M A SmetsDepartment of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding UVA 2011-4918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals at high risk for Lynch syndrome (LS) should be offered genetic counselling, since preventive options are available. However, uptake of genetic services and follow-up care are currently suboptimal, possibly caused by inadequate exchange of information. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to gain insight in the process of information exchange between patients diagnosed with LS and their non-genetic (i.e., general practitioner, gastroenterologist, gynaecologist) and genetic (i.e., clinical geneticist or genetic counsellor) health professionals concerning referral for genetic counselling and follow-up care. Participants comprised 13 patients diagnosed with LS (8 index patients and 5 of their affected relatives) and 24 health professionals (6 general practitioners, 8 gastroenterologists, 6 gynaecologists and 4 genetic health professionals). Analysis of the interview transcripts was performed in parallel and again after the interviews, following guidelines for qualitative research and using MAXQDA software. The main finding is that patients may 'get lost' between health professionals who lack a clear overview of their own and each other's role and responsibilities in the referral and follow-up care for patients with possible LS. Education of non-genetic health professionals and optimisation of communication between health professionals might help to enable more timely diagnosis of LS and allow patients to address their doubts and questions to the most appropriate healthcare professional.

Indexed as

CommunicationGastroenterologyGenetic testingReferral, hereditary colorectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30209752
PMCPMC6435774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.