ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2018
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Management of Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer: an Update.
Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enteric neuro-immune-tumor ecosystem in pancreatic, colorectal, and gastric malignancies: context dependence and translational priorities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Navigating chronic pancreatitis pain: a pathophysiological and therapeutic overview.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Pain in chronic pancreatitis: What can we do today?World journal of methodology · 2024Review
- Diagnostic Differentiation between Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Turkish Gastroenterology Association, Pancreas Study Group, Chronic Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with pancreatic cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020Article
- Celiac plexus block increases quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer.Journal of pain research · 2019Article
- Sarcopenia represents a negative prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing EUS celiac plexus neurolysis.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementPURPOSE OF REVIEW: Unrelenting pain from chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic cancer (PC) remain clinical challenges for the physician and a significant cause of decreased quality of life for the patient. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided therapy for each condition is distinct and builds on the endosonographer's straightforward access to the celiac axis. RECENT
findingsOver the past 20 years, generally small studies of modest methodology have surfaced for both EUS-guided celiac plexus block (CPB) and celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN). Our review aims to synthesize, analyze, and update the latest literature on the technique, efficacy, and safety of these procedures. EUS-CPB's role in treating CP pain is likely still relevant for a subset of patients and studies have shown efficacy and safety. However, a dramatic drop in research publications on the topic will make optimizing its role (including technique, injectate, and patient selection) increasingly difficult. However, EUS-CPN for PC pain is actively being refined with new information, data, and even guidelines. New EUS-guided strategies to treat PC pain besides conventional neurolysis are also likely to evolve in coming years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.