Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209640›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2020

Novel method of intraoperative ocular movement monitoring using a piezoelectric device: experimental study of ocular motor nerve activating piezoelectric potentials (OMNAPP) and clinical application for skull base surgeries.

Kiyohiko Sakata, Keiko Suematsu, Nobuyuki Takeshige, Yui Nagata, Kimihiko Orito, Naohisa Miyagi, Naoki Sakai, Tsunekazu Koseki, Motohiro Morioka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Advances in Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Techniques in Transnasal Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiyohiko SakataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan. kiyo@med.kurume-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-1732
Keiko SuematsuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Nobuyuki TakeshigeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Yui NagataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Kimihiko OritoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Naohisa MiyagiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Naoki SakaiUnique Medical Co., Ltd., 1-13-5, Izumihon-cho, Komae-shi, Tokyo, 201-0003, Japan.
Tsunekazu KosekiUnique Medical Co., Ltd., 1-13-5, Izumihon-cho, Komae-shi, Tokyo, 201-0003, Japan.
Motohiro MoriokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Kurume University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP16J68927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative monitoring systems that utilize various evoked potentials for the detection and/or preservation of cranial nerves have become increasingly common due to recent technical and commercial developments, particularly during skull base surgeries. We established a novel system for the intraoperative monitoring of the extraocular motor nerves (eOMNs) using a piezoelectric device capable of detecting imperceptible vibrations induced by ocular movement, with sensors placed on the eyelids alone. We first evaluated the efficacy and reliability of this device for the intraoperative monitoring of eOMNs in two Beagle dogs. Based on the results, we then determined the appropriate stimulation parameters for use in human surgical cases involving removal of various skull base tumors. Animal experiments revealed that a 0.4 mA monopolar electrical stimulation was required to elicit significant responses and that these responses were not inferior to those obtained via the electrooculogram/electromyogram. Significant responses were also detected in preliminary clinical investigations in human patients, following both direct and indirect monopolar electrical stimulation of the oculomotor and abducens nerves, although obtaining responses from the trochlear nerve was difficult. Intraoperative monitoring using a piezoelectric device provides a simple and reliable method for detecting eOMNs, especially the oculomotor and abducens nerves. This monitoring system can be adapted to various surgeries for skull base tumor.

Indexed as

Neurosurgical ProceduresAnimalsCranial NervesDogsElectric StimulationElectromyographyEvoked PotentialsEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, IntraoperativeReproducibility of ResultsSkull BaseSkull Base NeoplasmsIntraoperative ocular movement monitoringOcular motor nervesOcular motor nerves activating piezoelectric potentials (OMNAPP)Piezoelectric deviceSkull base surgery

Identifiers

PMID30209640
OpenAlexW2889706121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.