Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209638›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Therapy: Defining the Patient Who Will Benefit.

Marvin H Eng, Dee Dee Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Percutaneous Interventions for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marvin H EngCenter for Structural Heart Disease, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. Meng1@hfhs.org.
Dee Dee WangCenter for Structural Heart Disease, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Henry Ford Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis report aims to define the clinical and anatomic variables key in determining patient suitability for transcatheter mitral valve therapies. RECENT

findingsCandidacy for transcatheter mitral valve repair requires weighing the clinical variables that may impact the ability to improve patient symptoms and prolong survival that include left ventricular ejection fraction, symptom severity, pulmonary hypertension, and magnitude of residual regurgitation or stenosis. Individualized selection of transcatheter repair or replacement based on patho-anatomy is being explored. The primary goal is achieving significant reduction in mitral regurgitation. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement requires rigorous anatomic screening using computed tomography and candidates should be able to take oral anticoagulation. Selection of patients for transcatheter mitral valve repair is complex and requires intimate knowledge of clinical variables and specific device limitations.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMitral ValveMitral Valve AnnuloplastyMitral Valve InsufficiencyRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeMitral valvePercutaneousTranscatheterValve repairValve replacement

Identifiers

PMID30209638
OpenAlexW2891075863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.