Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209586›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2019

Diversity and Tissue Preference of Osmotolerant Bacterial Endophytes Associated with Pearl Millet Genotypes Having Differential Drought Susceptibilities.

B S Manjunatha, Sangeeta Paul, Chetana Aggarwal, S Bandeppa, V Govindasamy, Ajinath S Dukare, Maheshwar S Rathi, C T Satyavathi, K Annapurna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plant-AssociatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Catalytic potential of endophytes facilitates synthesis of biometallic zinc oxide nanoparticles for agricultural application.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

B S ManjunathaDivision of Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Sangeeta PaulDivision of Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India. sangeeta_paul2003@yahoo.co.in.
Chetana AggarwalICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
S BandeppaDivision of Soil Science, ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad, 500 030, India.
V GovindasamyDivision of Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Ajinath S DukareDivision of Horticultural Crop Processing, ICAR-Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering and Technology, Abohar, Punjab, 152 116, India.
Maheshwar S RathiDivision of Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
C T SatyavathiICAR-All India Coordinated Research Project on Pearl Millet, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, 342 304, India.
K AnnapurnaDivision of Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012, India.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INCentral Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology · INIndian Institute of Rice Research · INNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic and functional diversity of osmotolerant bacterial endophytes colonizing the root, stem, and leaf tissues of pearl millet genotypes differing in their drought susceptibility was assessed. Two genotypes of pearl millet, viz., the drought tolerant genotype TT-1 and the drought susceptible genotype PPMI-69, were used in the present study. Diazotrophs were found to be the predominant colonizers, followed by the Gram positive bacteria in most of the tissues of both the genotypes. Higher proportion of bacterial endophytes obtained from the drought tolerant genotype was found to be osmotolerant. Results of 16S rRNA gene-ARDRA analysis grouped 50 of the highly osmotolerant isolates into 16 clusters, out of which nine clusters had only one isolate each, indicating their uniqueness. One cluster had 21 isolates and remaining clusters were represented by isolates ranging from two to four. The representative isolates from each cluster were identified, and Bacillus was found to be the most prevalent osmotolerant genera with many different species. Other endophytic bacteria belonged to Pseudomonas sp., Stenotrophomonas sp., and Macrococcus caseolyticus. High phylogenetic diversity was observed in the roots of the drought tolerant genotype while different tissues of the drought susceptible genotype showed less diversity. Isolates of Bacillus axarquiensis were present in all the tissues of both the genotypes of pearl millet. However, most of the other endophytic bacteria showed tissue/genotype specificity. With the exception of B. axarquiensis and B. thuringiensis, rest all the species of Bacillus were found colonizing only the drought-tolerant genotype; while M. caseolyticus colonized all the tissues of only the drought susceptible genotype. There was high incidence of IAA producers and low incidence of ACC deaminase producers among the isolates from the root tissues of the drought-tolerant genotype while reverse was the case for the drought-susceptible genotype. Thus, host played an important role in the selection of endophytes based on both phylogenetic and functional traits.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBacteriaDroughtsEndophytesGenotypePennisetumPhylogenyPlant LeavesPlant RootsBacillus sp.DiversityFunctional characterizationGenotype specificityOsmotolerantTissue specificity

Identifiers

PMID30209586
OpenAlexW2891632760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.