Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209574›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2019

Regulation of plant cell wall stiffness by mechanical stress: a mesoscale physical model.

Hadrien Oliveri, Jan Traas, Christophe Godin, Olivier Ali

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Genetic Evidence ofGenes · 2024
    Article
  6. Structure and growth of plant cell walls.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Building an extensible cell wall.Plant physiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hadrien OliveriLaboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, Inria, 69342, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5488-5567
Jan TraasLaboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, Inria, 69342, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5107-1472
Christophe GodinLaboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, Inria, 69342, Lyon, France. christophe.godin@inria.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1202-8460
Olivier AliLaboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, Inria, 69342, Lyon, France. olivier.ali@inria.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7671-7225

Funding

European Research Council 294397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial question in developmental biology is how cell growth is coordinated in living tissue to generate complex and reproducible shapes. We address this issue here in plants, where stiff extracellular walls prevent cell migration and morphogenesis mostly results from growth driven by turgor pressure. How cells grow in response to pressure partly depends on the mechanical properties of their walls, which are generally heterogeneous, anisotropic and dynamic. The active control of these properties is therefore a cornerstone of plant morphogenesis. Here, we focus on wall stiffness, which is under the control of both molecular and mechanical signaling. Indeed, in plant tissues, the balance between turgor and cell wall elasticity generates a tissue-wide stress field. Within cells, mechano-sensitive structures, such as cortical microtubules, adapt their behavior accordingly and locally influence cell wall remodeling dynamics. To fully apprehend the properties of this feedback loop, modeling approaches are indispensable. To that end, several modeling tools in the form of virtual tissues have been developed. However, these models often relate mechanical stress and cell wall stiffness in relatively abstract manners, where the molecular specificities of the various actors are not fully captured. In this paper, we propose to refine this approach by including parsimonious biochemical and biomechanical properties of the main molecular actors involved. Through a coarse-grained approach and through finite element simulations, we study the role of stress-sensing microtubules on organ-scale mechanics.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnisotropyBiomechanical PhenomenaCelluloseCell WallComputer SimulationElasticityFinite Element AnalysisMathematical ConceptsMechanotransduction, CellularMicrofibrilsMicrotubulesPlant CellsPlant DevelopmentStress, MechanicalUser-Computer InterfaceCelluloseBiomechanicsCellulose microfibrilsCortical microtubulesMechanotransductionNumerical simulationPlant morphogenesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.