ArticlePsychopharmacology2018
Comparison of the effects of abstinence on MDMA and cocaine self-administration in rats.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subjective and neurocognitive profiling of clinical doses of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in healthy volunteers: implications for therapeutic use.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- Dual sigma receptor/dopamine transporter inhibition and the union of pharmacology and experimental psychology.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025Review
- Lack of evidence for positive reinforcing and prosocial effects of MDMA in pair-housed male and female rats.European journal of pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationale3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) preferentially increases synaptic serotonin (5HT). This response was attenuated following repeated exposure but there was recovery as a result of abstinence. Effects of abstinence on self-administration of many drugs have been documented but the impact on MDMA self-administration is unknown.
objectiveThis study compared the effects of abstinence on MDMA and cocaine self-administration.
methodsSix-hour daily MDMA or cocaine sessions were conducted until a total of 350 mg/kg had been self-administered. Following this, rats were randomly assigned to either a 0- or 14-day abstinence group. Self-administration testing then continued for an additional 7 days.
resultsThe latency to self-administer 350 mg/kg was shorter for rats that self-administered cocaine. The temporal distribution of responding within each test session also differed; MDMA self-administration was high during the first hour of each session, and decreased during subsequent hours, whereas cocaine self-administration was evenly distributed throughout each hour of the session. Abstinence decreased MDMA but not cocaine self-administration.
conclusionsThe selective reduction of MDMA self-administration following abstinence is consistent with the idea that MDMA-stimulated 5-HT release is inhibitory to MDMA self-administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.