ArticleExperimental brain research2018
The neural correlates of flow experience explored with transcranial direct current stimulation.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Single-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cerebral Blood Flow: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain topography · 2025Pooled it
- Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Flow Experience: An EEG Microstate Analysis.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Closed-loop acoustic stimulation modified by cathodal tDCS is beneficial for retention.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Physiological assessment of the psychological flow state using wearable devices.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The effect of music tempo on movement flow.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Testosterone and the Amygdala's Functional Connectivity in Women and Men.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The neural signatures of the psychological construct "flow": A replication study.Neuroimage. Reports · 2022Article
- Theta Neurofeedback Training Supports Motor Performance and Flow Experience.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2022Article
- Brain-Heart Interaction and the Experience of Flow While Playing a Video Game.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Self-transcendent experiences as promoters of ecological wellbeing? Exploration of the evidence and hypotheses to be tested.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Role of the right anterior insula for the emergence of flow-A combined task-based fMRI activation and connectivity study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Evaluating students' engagement with an online learning environment during and after COVID-19 related school closures: A survival analysis approach.Trends in neuroscience and education · 2021Article
- A Review on the Role of the Neuroscience of Flow States in the Modern World.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Article
- A Transcranial Stimulation Intervention to Support Flow State Induction.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The experience of flow ensues when humans engage in a demanding task while task demands are balanced with the individual's level of skill or ability. Here, we further tested the hypothesis that the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) plays a causal role in mediating flow experience using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to interfere with MPFC's deactivation evoked by a flow paradigm and measured by magnetic resonance (MR)-based perfusion imaging. In a balanced, within-subjects repeated measure design, three treatments of tDCS (sham, anodal, cathodal) were applied in a sample of 22 healthy male participants. tDCS-modulatory effects on flow-specific regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and subjective flow experience significantly depended on participants' baseline level of flow experience during sham tDCS. Those participants with lower-flow experience during sham tDCS (LF) benefitted from tDCS, particularly from the anodal polarity, whereas both active treatments did not substantially affect subjects with relatively higher baseline flow experience (HF). Functionally, in LF subjects, relative deactivation of the right amygdala got more pronounced under anodal and cathodal tDCS, and changed inconsistently in HF subjects. Inter-individual regression analyses of rCBF data suggested that involvement of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex appears crucial for affecting the response pattern in the right amygdala and can be modulated by tDCS. Present data support the notion that valuable insights into the neural mechanism of flow can be obtained using tDCS. However, a clearer understanding of tDCS' baseline dependency in terms of individual variations in brain connectivity states appears a necessary prerequisite to exploit this technique further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.