Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209517›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

The neural correlates of flow experience explored with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Martin Ulrich, Johannes Niemann, Markus Boland, Thomas Kammer, Filip Niemann, Georg Grön

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effect of music tempo on movement flow.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Theta Neurofeedback Training Supports Motor Performance and Flow Experience.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin UlrichSection Neuropsychology and Functional Imaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Johannes NiemannSection Neuropsychology and Functional Imaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Markus BolandGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 27, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas KammerSection Neuropsychology and Functional Imaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Filip NiemannSection Neuropsychology and Functional Imaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Georg GrönSection Neuropsychology and Functional Imaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 12-14, 89075, Ulm, Germany. georg.groen@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0282-3575
Universität Ulm · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experience of flow ensues when humans engage in a demanding task while task demands are balanced with the individual's level of skill or ability. Here, we further tested the hypothesis that the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) plays a causal role in mediating flow experience using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to interfere with MPFC's deactivation evoked by a flow paradigm and measured by magnetic resonance (MR)-based perfusion imaging. In a balanced, within-subjects repeated measure design, three treatments of tDCS (sham, anodal, cathodal) were applied in a sample of 22 healthy male participants. tDCS-modulatory effects on flow-specific regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and subjective flow experience significantly depended on participants' baseline level of flow experience during sham tDCS. Those participants with lower-flow experience during sham tDCS (LF) benefitted from tDCS, particularly from the anodal polarity, whereas both active treatments did not substantially affect subjects with relatively higher baseline flow experience (HF). Functionally, in LF subjects, relative deactivation of the right amygdala got more pronounced under anodal and cathodal tDCS, and changed inconsistently in HF subjects. Inter-individual regression analyses of rCBF data suggested that involvement of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex appears crucial for affecting the response pattern in the right amygdala and can be modulated by tDCS. Present data support the notion that valuable insights into the neural mechanism of flow can be obtained using tDCS. However, a clearer understanding of tDCS' baseline dependency in terms of individual variations in brain connectivity states appears a necessary prerequisite to exploit this technique further.

Indexed as

Brain MappingTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultAmygdalaCerebrovascular CirculationElectrodesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMalePrefrontal CortexRegression AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAmygdalaFlow experienceMPFCPerfusion imagingsgACCtDCS

Identifiers

PMID30209517
OpenAlexW2889602942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.