Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209513›Full record

Observational studyDer Anaesthesist2018

[Non-beneficial therapy and emotional exhaustion in end-of-life care : Results of a survey among intensive care unit personnel].

Christiane S Hartog, F Hoffmann, A Mikolajetz, S Schröder, A Michalsen, K Dey, R Riessen, U Jaschinski, M Weiss, M Ragaller and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Der Anaesthesist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Occupational Stress and Mental Health among Anesthetists during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hospitalization and Intensive Therapy at the End of Life.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Observational
  14. [Legal implications of overtreatment].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
  15. [Nonbeneficial care-a burden for clinicians and relatives].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Christiane S HartogKlinik für Anästhesie m.S. operative Intensivmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. Christiane.hartog@mailbox.org.
F HoffmannKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinik Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
A MikolajetzKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinik Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
S SchröderKlinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Krankenhaus Düren, Düren, Deutschland.
A MichalsenKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Medizin Campus Bodensee - Klinik Tettnang, Tettnang, Deutschland.
K DeyKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
R RiessenMedizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
U JaschinskiKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland.
M WeissKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.
M RagallerKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
S BerckerKlinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
J BriegelKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum der Universität, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
C SpiesKlinik für Anästhesie m.S. operative Intensivmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
D SchwarzkopfKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinik Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
SepNet Critical Care Trials Group – Ethicus II Studiengruppe
Klinik Bavaria · DEKrankenhaus Düren · DELMU Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMedizin Campus Bodensee · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnd-of-life care (EOLC) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is becoming increasingly more common but ethical standards are compromised by growing economic pressure. It was previously found that perception of non-beneficial treatment (NBT) was independently associated with the core burnout dimension of emotional exhaustion. It is unknown whether factors of the work environment also play a role in the context of EOLC.

objectiveIs the working environment associated with perception of NBT or clinician burnout? MATERIAL AND

methodsPhysicians and nursing personnel from 11 German ICUs who took part in an international, longitudinal prospective observational study on EOLC in 2015-2016 were surveyed using validated instruments. Risk factors were obtained by multivariate multilevel analysis.

resultsThe participation rate was 49.8% of personnel working in the ICU at the time of the survey. Overall, 325 nursing personnel, 91 residents and 26 consulting physicians participated. Nurses perceived NBT more frequently than physicians. Predictors for the perception of NBT were profession, collaboration in the EOLC context, excessively high workload (each p ≤ 0.001) and the numbers of weekend working days per month (p = 0.012). Protective factors against burnout included intensive care specialization (p = 0.001) and emotional support within the team (p ≤ 0.001), while emotional exhaustion through contact with relatives at the end of life and a high workload were both increased (each p ≤ 0.001). DISCUSSION: Using the example of EOLC, deficits in the work environment and stress factors were uncovered. Factors of the work environment are associated with perceived NBT. To reduce NBT and burnout, the quality of the work environment should be improved and intensive care specialization and emotional support within the team enhanced. Interprofessional decision-making among the ICU team and interprofessional collaboration should be improved by regular joint rounds and interprofessional case discussions. Mitigating stressful factors such as communication with relatives and high workload require allocation of respective resources.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBurnout, ProfessionalCritical CareEmotionsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLongitudinal StudiesMaleNursesPhysiciansProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal CareCritical careEnd-of-life careOccupational stressQuality of health careTerminal care

Identifiers

PMID30209513
OpenAlexW2891830281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.