Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209291›Full record

ArticleHeredity2019

Genomic comparisons reveal biogeographic and anthropogenic impacts in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus): a dietary-specialist species distributed across heterogeneous environments.

Shannon R Kjeldsen, Herman W Raadsma, Kellie A Leigh, Jennifer R Tobey, David Phalen, Andrew Krockenberger, William A Ellis, Emily Hynes, Damien P Higgins, Kyall R Zenger

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reversing the decline of threatened koala (Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Geographic patterns of koala retrovirus genetic diversity, endogenization, and subtype distributions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shannon R KjeldsenCentre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia. shannon.kjeldsen1@my.jcu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9745-9859
Herman W RaadsmaSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, Private Mail Bag 4003, Narellan, NSW, 2570, Australia.
Kellie A LeighSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, Private Mail Bag 4003, Narellan, NSW, 2570, Australia.
Jennifer R TobeySan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, CA, 92027, USA.
David PhalenSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, Private Mail Bag 4003, Narellan, NSW, 2570, Australia.
Andrew KrockenbergerCentre for Tropical Biodiversity and Climate Change, Division of Research and Innovation, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4878, Australia.
William A EllisSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Emily HynesEcoplan Australia, PO Box 968, Torquay, VIC, 3228, Australia.
Damien P HigginsSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Kyall R ZengerCentre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUJames Cook University · AUAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine · AUSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research · USThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council (ARC) LP120200630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Australian koala is an iconic marsupial with highly specific dietary requirements distributed across heterogeneous environments, over a large geographic range. The distribution and genetic structure of koala populations has been heavily influenced by human actions, specifically habitat modification, hunting and translocation of koalas. There is currently limited information on population diversity and gene flow at a species-wide scale, or with consideration to the potential impacts of local adaptation. Using species-wide sampling across heterogeneous environments, and high-density genome-wide markers (SNPs and PAVs), we show that most koala populations display levels of diversity comparable to other outbred species, except for those populations impacted by population reductions. Genetic clustering analysis and phylogenetic reconstruction reveals a lack of support for current taxonomic classification of three koala subspecies, with only a single evolutionary significant unit supported. Furthermore, ~70% of genetic variance is accounted for at the individual level. The Sydney Basin region is highlighted as a unique reservoir of genetic diversity, having higher diversity levels (i.e., Blue Mountains region; AvHe

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimal DistributionAnimalsBiological EvolutionConservation of Natural ResourcesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenomicsPhascolarctidaePhylogenyPhylogeographySelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID30209291
PMCPMC6461856
OpenAlexW2888490141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.