ArticleScientific reports2018
A microfluidic device for isolating intact chromosomes from single mammalian cells and probing their folding stability by controlling solution conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Cell Nucleus Extraction with Cellular Indexing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional optofluidic control using reconfigurable thermal barriers.Nature photonics · 2025Article
- Deterministic assembly of chromosome ensembles in a programmable membrane trap array.Biofabrication · 2021Article
- Bridging the Gap between Vertebrate Cytogenetics and Genomics with Single-Chromosome Sequencing (ChromSeq).Genes · 2021Review
- Micro- and Nano-Devices for Studying Subcellular Biology.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021Review
- Using contact statistics to characterize structure transformation of biopolymer ensembles.Physical review. E · 2020Article
- Microfluidic epigenomic mapping technologies for precision medicine.Lab on a chip · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromatin folding shows spatio-temporal fluctuations in living undifferentiated cells, but fixed spatial heterogeneity in differentiated cells. However, little is known about variation in folding stability along the chromatin fibres during differentiation. In addition, effective methods to investigate folding stability at the single cell level are lacking. In the present study, we developed a microfluidic device that enables non-destructive isolation of chromosomes from single mammalian cells as well as real-time microscopic monitoring of the partial unfolding and stretching of individual chromosomes with increasing salt concentrations under a gentle flow. Using this device, we compared the folding stability of chromosomes between non-differentiated and differentiated cells and found that the salt concentration which induces the chromosome unfolding was lower (≤500 mM NaCl) for chromosomes derived from undifferentiated cells, suggesting that the chromatin folding stability of these cells is lower than that of differentiated cells. In addition, individual unfolded chromosomes, i.e., chromatin fibres, were stretched to 150-800 µm non-destructively under 750 mM NaCl and showed distributions of highly/less folded regions along the fibres. Thus, our technique can provide insights into the aspects of chromatin folding that influence the epigenetic control of cell differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.