Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209249›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Neuronal heterogeneity and stereotyped connectivity in the auditory afferent system.

Charles Petitpré, Haohao Wu, Anil Sharma, Anna Tokarska, Paula Fontanet, Yiqiao Wang, Françoise Helmbacher, Kevin Yackle, Gilad Silberberg, Saida Hadjab and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Neural Hearing Loss: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment Horizons.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Charles PetitpréDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Haohao WuDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Anil SharmaDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7442-8494
Anna TokarskaDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Paula FontanetDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Yiqiao WangDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1769-1966
Françoise HelmbacherAix-Marseille Université, CNRS UMR7288, Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille (IBDM), 13009, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6822-1246
Kevin YackleDepartment of Physiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Gilad SilberbergDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9964-505X
Saida HadjabDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
François LallemendDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden. francois.lallemend@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiral ganglion (SG) neurons of the cochlea convey all auditory inputs to the brain, yet the cellular and molecular complexity necessary to decode the various acoustic features in the SG has remained unresolved. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we identify four types of SG neurons, including three novel subclasses of type I neurons and the type II neurons, and provide a comprehensive genetic framework that define their potential synaptic communication patterns. The connectivity patterns of the three subclasses of type I neurons with inner hair cells and their electrophysiological profiles suggest that they represent the intensity-coding properties of auditory afferents. Moreover, neuron type specification is already established at birth, indicating a neuronal diversification process independent of neuronal activity. Thus, this work provides a transcriptional catalog of neuron types in the cochlea, which serves as a valuable resource for dissecting cell-type-specific functions of dedicated afferents in auditory perception and in hearing disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsCochleaHair Cells, AuditoryHair Cells, Auditory, InnerNeuronsNeurons, AfferentSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisSpiral GanglionSynaptic Potentials

Identifiers

PMID30209249
PMCPMC6135759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.