Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30209157›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2018

Screening and prevention for latent tuberculosis in immunosuppressed patients at risk for tuberculosis: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.

Tasnim Hasan, Eric Au, Sharon Chen, Allison Tong, Germaine Wong

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tuberculosis in kidney transplant candidates and recipients.World journal of transplantation · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Latent Tuberculosis Infection Testing Practices in a Large US Integrated Healthcare System.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Infectious Complications of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Understanding the Decline of Incident, Active Tuberculosis in People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Switzerland.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Impact of diabetes mellitus on immunity to latent tuberculosis infection.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2023
    Review
  20. Biomarkers to identifyThe European respiratory journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tasnim HasanCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Eric AuCentre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Sharon ChenCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Allison TongCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Germaine WongCentre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveImmunosuppressed individuals are at a high risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and clinical practice guidelines for the screening and management of LTBI in at-risk patients have been developed. We assessed the scope, quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines on screening for LTBI and the prevention of tuberculosis infection (TB) in high-risk patient populations.

designWe conducted a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Methodological quality of these guidelines was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Education (AGREE) II instrument. Textual synthesis was used to summarise and compare the recommendations. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO) and guideline registries were searched from inception to December 2017.

resultsThirty-eight guidelines were included. Nineteen focused on patients receiving medical immunosuppression, seven on transplantation, three on patients with HIV and nine were generalised across all at risk populations. Most guidelines (n=32, 84%) used a systematic approach to identify and appraise the evidence. The methodological quality of the guidelines varied with the overall mean AGREE II scores ranging from 35% to 80%. Guidelines performed poorly in terms of editorial independence (average score 35%, range 0%-92%); however, most were robust in defining their scope and purpose (average score 80%, range 56%-100%). Guidelines recommended either or both the tuberculin skin test and the interferon gamma release assay for screening. Treatment of LTBI with isoniazid was consistently recommended.

conclusionClinical practice guidelines on LTBI vary in quality and scope. The recommendations for screening varied across guidelines, while recommendations for treatment were largely consistent. Improving the consistency and quality of guidelines may help to optimise the screening and management of LTBI for improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostLatent TuberculosisPreventive Health ServicesHumansMass ScreeningPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk Assessmentimmunosuppressionlatent tuberculosisscreening

Identifiers

PMID30209157
PMCPMC6144320
OpenAlexW2890690121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.