Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208973›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2018

Cycles of gene expression and genome response during mammalian tissue regeneration.

Leonor Rib, Dominic Villeneuve, Shilpi Minocha, Viviane Praz, Nouria Hernandez, Nicolas Guex, Winship Herr, CycliX Consortium

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CIDEC Restricts Liver Regeneration by Disturbing Lipid Droplet Triglyceride Turnover.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonor RibCenter for Integrative Genomics, Génopode, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dominic VilleneuveCenter for Integrative Genomics, Génopode, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Shilpi MinochaCenter for Integrative Genomics, Génopode, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Viviane PrazCenter for Integrative Genomics, Génopode, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nouria HernandezCenter for Integrative Genomics, Génopode, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas GuexSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Génopode, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. nicolas.guex@sib.swiss.
Winship HerrCenter for Integrative Genomics, Génopode, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. winship.herr@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3606-4546
CycliX Consortium
University of Lausanne · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_170150Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung CRSII3_160798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompensatory liver hyperplasia-or regeneration-induced by two-thirds partial hepatectomy (PH) permits the study of synchronized activation of mammalian gene expression, particularly in relation to cell proliferation. Here, we measured genomic transcriptional responses and mRNA accumulation changes after PH and sham surgeries.

resultsDuring the first 10-20 h, the PH- and sham-surgery responses were very similar, including parallel early activation of cell-division-cycle genes. After 20 h, however, whereas post-PH livers continued with a robust and coordinate cell-division-cycle gene-expression response before returning to the resting state by 1 week, sham-surgery livers returned directly to a resting gene-expression state. Localization of RNA polymerase II (Pol II), and trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3) and 36 (H3K36me3) on genes dormant in the resting liver and activated during the PH response revealed a general de novo promoter Pol II recruitment and H3K4me3 increase during the early 10-20 h phase followed by Pol II elongation and H3K36me3 accumulation in gene bodies during the later proliferation phase. H3K36me3, generally appearing at the first internal exon, was preceded 5' by H3K36me2; 3' of the first internal exon, in about half of genes H3K36me3 predominated and in the other half H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 co-existed. Further, we observed some unusual gene profiles with abundant Pol II but little evident H3K4me3 or H3K36me3 modification, indicating that these modifications are neither universal nor essential partners to Pol II transcription.

conclusionsPH and sham surgical procedures on mice reveal striking early post-operatory gene expression similarities followed by synchronized mRNA accumulation and epigenetic histone mark changes specific to PH.

Indexed as

Histone CodeLiver RegenerationTranscriptomeAnimalsDNA Polymerase IIEpigenesis, GeneticLiverMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscriptional ActivationDNA Polymerase IIGene expressionHistone modificationLiver regenerationPartial hepatectomyTranscription

Identifiers

PMID30208973
PMCPMC6134763
OpenAlexW2951475761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.