Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208941›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Molecular surveillance and phylogenetic traits of Babesia bigemina and Babesia bovis in cattle (Bos taurus) and water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from Colombia.

Jeiczon Jaimes-Dueñez, Omar Triana-Chávez, Andrés Holguín-Rocha, Alberto Tobon-Castaño, Ana M Mejía-Jaramillo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. First Autochthonous Report on CattlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Survey ofVeterinary sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diagnostic Tools for the Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  19. Variable and Variant Protein Multigene Families inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeiczon Jaimes-DueñezGrupo BCEI, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
Omar Triana-ChávezGrupo BCEI, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
Andrés Holguín-RochaGrupo Malaria, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
Alberto Tobon-CastañoGrupo Malaria, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
Ana M Mejía-JaramilloGrupo BCEI, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia. anamejia25@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-9858
Universidad de Antioquia · CO

Funding

Colciencias phD fellowUnivesidad de Antioquia Sostenibilidad 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBabesia bigemina and B. bovis are two economically important hemoparasites affecting both cattle and buffaloes involved in dairy and beef production. In Colombia, although some parasitological and serological studies suggest an endemicity of these pathogens in areas under 1000 m, little is known about its molecular prevalence in different host. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence and molecular traits of these parasites in cattle and buffaloes from two Colombian regions.

methodsBetween 2014 and 2016, a three-point longitudinal survey was designed in farms from Caribbean and Orinoquia regions to evaluate the molecular prevalence of B. bigemina and B. bovis using a nested PCR (n-PCR) targeting hypothetical protein (hyp) and rhoptry-associated protein (RAP-1) genes, respectively. A total of 1432 cattle, 152 buffalo and 1439 Rhipicephalus microplus samples were analyzed. Moreover, phylogenetic relationship of isolates was analyzed using the 18S rRNA gene.

resultsA molecular prevalence of 31.6% (24.2% for B. bigemina and 14.4% for B. bovis), 23.6% (6.5% for B. bigemina and 17.7% for B. bovis) and 4.3% (3.5% for B. bigemina and 1.0% for B. bovis) was observed in cattle, buffaloes and Rhipicephalus microplus, respectively. Higher values of infection were observed during the wet season and late wet season; nevertheless, other variables such as age, production type, sex, breed and babesiosis control were also significantly associated with infection. Prevalence analysis showed that B. bovis infection was higher in cattle that coexist with buffaloes, when compared to those which did not. For each species, phylogenetic analyses revealed a high genetic diversity of isolates without clusters related to the isolation source.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal survey that evaluates through molecular methods, the infection of B. bigemina and B. bovis in two important livestock regions from Colombia. This study reveals that the prevalence of infection by Babesia spp., in cattle and buffaloes are modulated by seasonal variations, host factors and vector traits. Our results provide new insights on the epidemiological aspects of infection of Babesia spp., in cattle and buffaloes, which must be taken into consideration when babesiosis control programs are implemented in the study area.

Indexed as

AnimalsBabesiaBabesia bovisBabesiosisBuffaloesCattleCattle DiseasesColombiaFemaleGenetic VariationLongitudinal StudiesMalePhenotypePhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceBabesiaCattleColombianPCRWater buffaloes

Identifiers

PMID30208941
PMCPMC6136160
OpenAlexW2891611062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.