Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208936›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

Abdominal organ position variation in children during image-guided radiotherapy.

Sophie C Huijskens, Irma W E M van Dijk, Jorrit Visser, Brian V Balgobind, D Te Lindert, Coen R N Rasch, Tanja Alderliesten, Arjan Bel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie C HuijskensAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.c.huijskens@amc.uva.nl.
Irma W E M van DijkAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jorrit VisserAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brian V BalgobindAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D Te LindertAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Coen R N RaschAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tanja AlderliestenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjan BelAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 2016-10113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterfractional organ position variation might differ for abdominal organs and this could have consequences for defining safety margins. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to quantify interfractional position variations of abdominal organs in children in order to investigate possible correlations between abdominal organs and determine whether position variation is location-dependent.

methodsFor 20 children (2.2-17.8 years), we retrospectively analyzed 113 CBCTs acquired during the treatment course, which were registered to the reference CT to assess interfractional position variation of the liver, spleen, kidneys, and both diaphragm domes. Organ position variation was assessed in three orthogonal directions and relative to the bony anatomy. Diaphragm dome position variation was assessed in the cranial-caudal (CC) direction only. We investigated possible correlations between position variations of the organs (Spearman's correlation test, ρ), and tested if organ position variations in the CC direction are related to the diaphragm dome position variations (linear regression analysis, R

resultsIn all directions, correlations between liver and spleen position variations, and between right and left kidney position variations were weak (ρ ≤ 0.43). In the CC direction, the position variations of the right and left diaphragm domes were significantly, and stronger, correlated with position variations of the liver (R

conclusionsNo (strong) correlations between interfractional position variations of abdominal organs in children were observed. From present results, we concluded that diaphragm dome position variations could be more representative for superiorly located abdominal (liver, spleen) organ position variations than for inferiorly located (kidneys) organ position variations. Differences of systematic and random errors between abdominal organs were small, suggesting that for margin definitions, there was insufficient evidence of a dependence of organ position variation on anatomical location.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedAbdomenAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDiaphragmDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansKidneyLiverMaleNeoplasmsOrgan MotionRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAbdominal organ motionIGRTInterfractional organ position variationPediatric RT

Identifiers

PMID30208936
PMCPMC6136223
OpenAlexW2889983067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.