Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208923›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2018

Determination of the expression of three fimbrial subunit proteins in cultured Trueperella pyogenes.

Mengcheng Liu, Bing Wang, Hongmin Liang, Bo Ma, Junwei Wang, Wenlong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Combined Prokaryotic Transcriptomics and Proteomics Analysis of ClinicalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative Genome Analysis of 19Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Effects of Luteolin on Biofilm ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Pathogenicity and Virulence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mengcheng LiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road 600, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Bing WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road 600, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Hongmin LiangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road 600, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Bo MaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road 600, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Junwei WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road 600, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Wenlong ZhangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Changjiang Road 600, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China. zhangwenlong@neau.edu.cn.

Funding

"Academic Backbone" Project of Northeast Agricultural University 17XG09National Natural Science Foundation of China 31402177National Natural Science Foundation of China 31672529University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province UNPYSCT-2017019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrueperella pyogenes is a commensal and a significant opportunistic pathogen in animals. A variety of identified or putative virulence factors are considered to significantly contribute to the occurrence of T. pyogenes infection in different species. However, these virulence factors are not fully understood.

resultsIn the current study, the genes encoding putative fimbrial proteins, i.e. Fim A, Fim C, and Fim E, were cloned. Recombinant Fim A (rFim A), Fim C (rFim C), and Fim E (rFim E) were prepared and used to generate rabbit anti-rFim A, anti-rFim C, and anti-rFim E serum, respectively. Using these sera, we found that only Fim E was constitutively expressed in T. pyogenes. The expression level of Fim E in T. pyogenes peaked within 6-10 h of culture period in pH 7.5. Fim E protein expression was unaffected by anaerobic condition, but was inhibited by the microaerophilic condition. Tube agglutination tests indicated that Fim E was exhibited on the surface of T. pyogenes cells because anti-rFim E serum caused strong agglutination. Additionally, the blots for Fim A detection showed nonspecific reactions. Furthermore, the tube agglutination tests showed that anti-Fim A serum failed to cause agglutination of T. pyogenes cells, which indicated that Fim A was not, or poorly, expressed in cultured T. pyogenes. Anti-rFim C serum caused strong agglutination. However, the blots for Fim C detection showed a strong nonspecific reaction. Thus, the expression of Fim C was difficult to be determined using the current method.

conclusionsFim E was expressed in cultured T. pyogenes. However, Fim A was either not or poorly expressed in cultured T. pyogenes. Moreover, Fim C expression was not determined using the current strategy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialActinomycetaceaeFimbriae ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingFimbriae ProteinsExpressionFim A, Fim C and Fim ETrueperella pyogenesVirulence factors

Identifiers

PMID30208923
PMCPMC6134790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.