Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208915›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2018

A continuous repetitive task to detect fatigability in spinal muscular atrophy.

Marloes Stam, Renske I Wadman, Bart Bartels, Maureen Leeuw, Henk-Jan Westeneng, Camiel A Wijngaarde, Leonard H van den Berg, W Ludo van der Pol

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Fatigue in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: a fundamental open issue.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Pathophysiology and Management of Fatigue in Neuromuscular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Marloes StamDepartment of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, F02.230, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. M.Stam-8@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-4922
Renske I WadmanDepartment of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, F02.230, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bart BartelsChild Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maureen LeeuwDepartment of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, F02.230, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Henk-Jan WestenengDepartment of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, F02.230, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Camiel A WijngaardeDepartment of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, F02.230, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Leonard H van den BergDepartment of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, F02.230, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W Ludo van der PolDepartment of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, F02.230, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds WAR08-24Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds WAR13-07Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds WAR14-26stichting Spieren voor Spieren na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine the value of a continuous repetitive task to detect and quantify fatigability as additional dimension of impaired motor function in patients with hereditary proximal spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).

resultsIn this repeated measure case-control study 52 patients with SMA types 2-4, 17 healthy and 29 disease controls performed five consecutive rounds of the Nine-Hole Peg test to determine the presence of fatigability. We analysed differences in test performance and associations with disease characteristics. Five patients with SMA type 2 (22%) and 1 disease control (3%) could not finish five rounds due to fatigue (p = 0.01). Patients with SMA type 2 performed the test significantly more slowly than all other groups (p < 0.005) and disease controls were slower than healthy controls (p < 0.05). Patients with SMA type 2 performed round five 27% slower than round one, while healthy controls performed round five 14% faster than round one (p = 0.005). There was no difference between SMA type 3a, type 3b/4 or disease controls and healthy controls (p > 0.4). Time needed to complete each round during the five-round task increased in 15 patients with SMA type 2 (65%), 4 with type 3a (36%), 4 with type 3b/4 (22%), 9 disease controls (31%) and 1 healthy control (6%). There was no effect of age at disease onset or disease duration in SMA type 2 (p = 0.39). Test-retest reliability was high.

conclusionFatigability of remaining arm function is a feature of SMA type 2 and can be determined with continuous repetitive tasks.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesChildDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscular Atrophy, SpinalReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodYoung AdultClinical neurologyFatigabilityNeuromuscular diseaseOutcome measurer9HPTRepeated nine-hole peg testSMASpinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID30208915
PMCPMC6134509
OpenAlexW2890607145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.