ArticleBMC veterinary research2018
Haemodynamic changes during propofol induction in dogs: new findings and approach of monitoring.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anaesthetic Management Including Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine and Butorphanol in Dogs Undergoing ECG-Gated Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Case Series.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Quantitative myocardial mapping using 3.0 T cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in dogs: adenosine stress-rest evaluation.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Dexmedetomidine or Butorphanol for Co-Induction of General Anaesthesia with Propofol in Unpremedicated Healthy Dogs: Clinical and Echocardiographic Assessment.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Effect of acepromazine or dexmedetomidine associated with methadone on anesthetic induction with propofol at a rate of 1 mg/kg/min in healthy dogs: A randomized clinical trial.Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Quality of Recovery from General Anesthesia in Dogs with Two Different Low Doses of Dexmedetomidine.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Effects of ketamine, propofol and isoflurane on electrocardiographic variables in clinically healthy dogs premedicated with medetomidine and midazolam.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2024Article
- Hemodynamic Assessment via Echocardiography During Propofol Anesthetic Induction in Healthy Dogs.Veterinary medicine international · 2024Article
- Comparison of hemodynamic effects of propofol or alfaxalone during induction in dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Anaesthesia in Veterinary Oncology: The Effects of Surgery, Volatile and Intravenous Anaesthetics on the Immune System and Tumour Spread.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
- Haemodynamic Effects of Pimobendan during General Anaesthesia in Healthy Senior Dogs: A Prospective, Randomised, Triple-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- The impact of stress and anesthesia on animal models of infectious disease.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Effects of different rates of propofol with or without S-ketamine on ventricular function in healthy cats - a randomized study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Agreement between transthoracic echocardiography and esophageal Doppler on aortic flow variables in anesthetized mechanically ventilated dogs.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2022Article
- Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of liver in healthy dogs: anaesthesia as a source of variability.International journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2022Article
- Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of HSK3486, a Novel 2,6-Disubstituted Phenol Derivative as a General Anesthetic.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Effects of thoracolumbar epidural anesthesia with lidocaine on the systemic hemodynamics and hepatic blood flow in propofol anesthetized dogs.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2021Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Premedication in Balanced Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Conventional Echocardiography and Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking in Healthy Sevoflurane-Anesthetized Dogs Undergoing Continuous Rate Infusion of Nalbuphine.Veterinary medicine international · 2020Article
- Appearance of post-induction respiratory apnoea in dogs following slow or fast administration of propofol.Veterinary evidenceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPropofol is one of the most widely used injectable anaesthetic agents in veterinary practice. Cardiovascular effects related to propofol use in dogs remain less well defined. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the haemodynamic changes during induction of general anaesthesia with propofol in healthy dogs, by a beat-to-beat continuous monitoring. All dogs were premedicated with intramuscular acepromazine (0.015 mg/kg) and methadone (0.15 mg/kg). Transthoracic echocardiography was used to measure the velocity time integral (VTI) of the left ventricular outflow tract. A syringe driver, programmed to deliver propofol 5 mg/kg over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion of 25 mg/kg/h, was used to induce and maintain anaesthesia. From the initiation of propofol administration, heart rate (HR) and mean invasive arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded every 5 s for 300 s, while aortic blood flow was continuously recorded and stored for 300 S. maximum cardiovascular depression was defined the lowest MAP (MAP_Tpeak) recorded during the monitored interval. VTI and VTI*HR were calculated at 0, 30, 90, 120, 150 and 300 s post administration of propofol, and at MAP_Tpeak. Haemodynamic effects of propofol in relation to plasma and biophase concentrations were also evaluated by pharmacokinetics simulation.
resultsThe median (range) HR was significantly higher (p = 0.006) at the moment of maximum hemodynamic depression (Tpeak) [105(70-148) bpm] compared with pre-induction values (T0) [65(50-120) bpm]. The median (range) MAP was significantly lower (p < 0.001) at Tpeak [61(51-69) mmHg] compared with T0 [88(72-97) mmHg]. The median (range) VTI and VTI*HR were similar at the two time points [11.9(8.1-17.3) vs 13,3(9,4-16,5) cm, and 1172(806-1554) vs 1002(630-1159) cm*bpm, respectively].
conclusionsInduction of anaesthesia with propofol causes a drop of arterial pressure in healthy dogs, however cardiac output is well maintained by compensatory chronotropic response. The magnitude of MAP_Tpeak may be strictly related with propofol plasma concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.