Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208890›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Equity and efficiency of primary health care resource allocation in mainland China.

Yue Zhang, Qian Wang, Tian Jiang, Jian Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Regional distribution differences and influencing factors of primary healthcare institutions in China].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue ZhangSchool of Health Care Management, Shandong University, 44 Culture Road, Li Xia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Qian WangSchool of Health Care Management, Shandong University, 44 Culture Road, Li Xia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China.
Tian JiangSchool of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University, 5 Hongjialou, Li Cheng District, Jinan, 250100, Shandong Province, China.
Jian WangSchool of Health Care Management, Shandong University, 44 Culture Road, Li Xia District, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China. Jianw@sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

Shandong University 2017Y03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChina had proposed the unification of equity and efficiency since the launch of the new round of health system reform in 2009. And the central government gave priority to the development of primary health care (PHC) whilst ensuring its availability and improving its efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the changes of equity and efficiency in PHC resource allocation (PHCRA) and explored ways to improve the current situation.

methodsThe data of this study came from the China Health Statistical Yearbook (2013-2017) and China Statistical Yearbook (2017). Three and five indicators were used to measure equity and efficiency, respectively. The Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient (G), Theil index (T) and health resource density index (HRDI) were used to assess equity in demographic and geographical dimensions. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist productivity index (MPI) were chosen to measure the efficiency and productivity of PHCRA.

resultsFrom 2012 to 2016, the total amount of PHCR had increased year by year. The Gs by population size were below 0.2 and that by geographical area were between 0.6 and 0.7. T had the same trend with G, and intra-regional contribution rates were higher than inter-regional contribution rates, which were all beyond 60%. From 2012 to 2016, the numbers of provinces that achieved an effective DEA were 4, 3, 4, 5 and 5, respectively. The mean of the total factor productivity index was 0.994.

conclusionThe equity of PHCRA in terms of population size is superior in the geographical area. Intra-regional differences are the main source of inequality. The eastern region has the highest density of PHCR, whereas the western region has the lowest. In addition, PHC institutions in more than 80% of the provinces are inefficient, and the productivity of the institutions decline by 0.6% from 2012 to 2016 because of technological retrogression.

Indexed as

ChinaEfficiency, OrganizationalHealthcare DisparitiesHealth EquityHealth ResourcesHumansPrimary Health CareResource AllocationSocioeconomic FactorsEfficiencyEquityPrimary health careProductivity

Identifiers

PMID30208890
PMCPMC6134520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.