Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208883›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2018

Novel insights into the host immune response of chicken Harderian gland tissue during Newcastle disease virus infection and heat treatment.

Perot Saelao, Ying Wang, Rodrigo A Gallardo, Susan J Lamont, Jack M Dekkers, Terra Kelly, Huaijun Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Perot SaelaoIntegrative Genetics and Genomics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Ying WangGenomics to Improve Poultry Innovation Lab, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Rodrigo A GallardoSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Susan J LamontDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Jack M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Terra KellyGenomics to Improve Poultry Innovation Lab, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Huaijun ZhouGenomics to Improve Poultry Innovation Lab, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. hzhou@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6023-9521
University of California, Davis · USIowa State University · USPoultry Research Institute · CN

Funding

USAID AID-OAA-A-13-00080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewcastle disease virus, in its most pathogenic form, threatens the livelihood of rural poultry farmers where there is a limited infrastructure and service for vaccinations to prevent outbreaks of the virus. Previously reported studies on the host response to Newcastle disease in chickens have not examined the disease under abiotic stressors, such as heat, which commonly experienced by chickens in regions such as Africa. The objective of this study was to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms that contribute to disease resistance in chickens to the Newcastle disease virus while under the effects of heat stress.

resultsDifferential gene expression analysis identified genes differentially expressed between treated and non-treated birds across three time points (2, 6, and 10 days post-infection) in Fayoumi and Leghorn birds. Across the three time points, Fayoumi had very few genes differentially expressed between treated and non-treated groups at 2 and 6 days post-infection. However, 202 genes were differentially expressed at 10 days post-infection. Alternatively, Leghorn had very few genes differentially expressed at 2 and 10 days post-infection but had 167 differentially expressed genes at 6 days post-infection. Very few differentially expressed genes were shared between the two genetic lines, and pathway analysis found unique signaling pathways specific to each genetic line. Fayoumi had significantly lower viral load, higher viral clearance, higher anti-NDV antibody levels, and fewer viral transcripts detected compared to Leghorns. Fayoumis activated immune related pathways including SAPK/JNK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways at earlier time points, while Leghorn would activate these same pathways at a later time. Further analysis revealed activation of the GP6 signaling pathway that may be responsible for the susceptible Leghorn response.

conclusionsThe findings in this study confirmed our hypothesis that the Fayoumi line was more resistant to Newcastle disease virus infection compared to the Leghorn line. Within line and interaction analysis demonstrated substantial differences in response patterns between the two genetic lines that was not observed from the within line contrasts. This study has provided novel insights into the transcriptome response of the Harderian gland tissue during Newcastle disease virus infection while under heat stress utilizing a unique resistant and susceptible model.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureAnimalsAntibodies, ViralChickensDisease ResistanceFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHarderian GlandMaleNewcastle DiseaseNewcastle disease virusSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeAntibodies, ViralDisease resistanceHarderian glandHeat stressNewcastle disease virusRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID30208883
PMCPMC6134752
OpenAlexW2892351445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.