Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208578›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2018

A Brief Questionnaire to Assess Post-Exertional Malaise.

Joseph Cotler, Carly Holtzman, Catherine Dudun, Leonard A Jason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Recent research in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: an evidence map.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Item comprehension and content coverage of patient-reported outcome measures for long COVID: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph CotlerCenter for Community Research, Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60604, USA. Jcotler@depaul.edu.
Carly HoltzmanCenter for Community Research, Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60604, USA. CholtzM1@depaul.edu.
Catherine DudunCenter for Community Research, Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60604, USA. Cdudun@depaul.edu.
Leonard A JasonCenter for Community Research, Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60604, USA. LJason@depaul.edu.

Funding

A prospective study of CFS following infectious mononucleosis in college studentsR01AI105781 · NIAID · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI JASON, LEONARD A, KATZ, BEN Z. · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AI105781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a key symptom of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Currently, five PEM-items from the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) were recommended as a first step in measuring this symptom for patients with ME and CFS by the National Institutes of Health/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (NIH/CDC) Common Data Elements' (CDE) working group. The second step in this process, as recommended by the NIH/CDC CDE working group, involves assembling information from various sources to confirm the presence of PEM. There have not been any efforts, to date, to standardize this second-step process in the assessment of PEM. The current study examined whether five supplementary items on the DSQ could be used to operationalize the second step of the recommendations made by the NIH/CDC CDE working group. The five supplementary DSQ PEM duration items correctly categorized patients with ME or CFS 81.7% of the time, while incorrectly categorizing multiple sclerosis (MS) and post-polio syndrome (PPS) as ME or CFS only 16.6% of the time. The findings suggested that a PEM second-step process could be operationalized using supplementary DSQ items.

Indexed as

chronic fatigue syndromemyalgic encephalomyelitispost-exertional malaise

Identifiers

PMID30208578
PMCPMC6165517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.