Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208381›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2019

Biliary-Enteric Drainage vs Primary Liver Transplant as Initial Treatment for Children With Biliary Atresia.

Elyse LeeVan, Lea Matsuoka, Shu Cao, Susan Groshen, Sophoclis Alexopoulos

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biliary atresia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Primary liver transplantationWorld journal of transplantation · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. In vitro fertilization: an unexpected finding in a cohort of patients with biliary atresia.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elyse LeeVanDepartment of Surgery, Huntington Memorial Hospital, Pasadena, California.
Lea MatsuokaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Shu CaoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck Hospital, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Susan GroshenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck Hospital, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Sophoclis AlexopoulosDivision of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USHuntington Hospital · USKeck Hospital of USC · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Some infants with biliary atresia are treated with primary liver transplant (pLT), but most are initially treated with biliary-enteric drainage (BED) with a subsequent salvage liver transplant. Given the improvements in liver transplant outcomes, it is important to determine whether BED treatment remains the optimal surgical algorithm for patients with biliary atresia. Objective: To compare the survival of patients with biliary atresia initially treated with BED with patients who underwent pLT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used deidentified records from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database to identify patients with biliary atresia (n = 1252) between January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2015. Patients were categorized into 1 of 2 cohorts: those who received BED treatment and those who underwent pLT. Excluded from the study were those born before January 1, 1995, and those without any documented operative intervention by age 5 years. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was compared between the BED and pLT cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. The treatment's association with treatment era was examined by comparing survival before 2002 and on or after January 1, 2002. Results: In total, 1252 patients with biliary atresia were identified. After exclusions, 626 remained; of these patients, 351 (56.1%) were female and 275 (43.9%) were male with a median (interquartile range) age at intervention for initial BED treatment of 65 (48-81) days. Among the 626 patients studied, initial BED treatment was performed in 313 patients (50.0%), and pLT was performed in 313 patients (50.0%). Although patients who underwent pLT had a higher mortality rate within the first 3 months after the procedure, they had a reduced risk of long-term mortality compared with patients initially managed with BED treatment (hazard ratio [HR] ≥6 months after the initial procedure, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.42; P = .01). Patients requiring salvage liver transplant had a substantially higher risk of mortality than patients who received pLT (HR, 0.43; 95% CI 0.25-0.76; P = .003). Those who underwent pLT had superior survival compared with BED treatment recipients on or after 2002 (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.54; P < .001), and that persisted when censoring patients who underwent salvage liver transplant (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.82; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Patients who underwent pLT experienced superior long-term survival compared with patients who underwent BED treatment. Multi-institutional trials are needed to determine which initial treatment is most advantageous to patients with biliary atresia.

Indexed as

Biliary AtresiaCaliforniaDrainageFemaleHumansInfantKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver TransplantationMaleRisk FactorsSalvage Therapy

Identifiers

PMID30208381
PMCPMC6439864
OpenAlexW2891804332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.