Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30208028›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

Vocal practice regulates singing activity-dependent genes underlying age-independent vocal learning in songbirds.

Shin Hayase, Hongdi Wang, Eri Ohgushi, Masahiko Kobayashi, Chihiro Mori, Haruhito Horita, Katsuhiko Mineta, Wan-Chun Liu, Kazuhiro Wada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The central role of the individual in the history of brains.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Resurgent NaNature communications · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Cross-species parallels in babbling: animals and algorithms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shin HayaseGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hongdi WangGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Eri OhgushiGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masahiko KobayashiGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Chihiro MoriGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Haruhito HoritaGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Katsuhiko MinetaKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Computational Bioscience Research Center, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Wan-Chun LiuDepartment of Psychology, Colgate University, Hamilton, New York, United States of America.
Kazuhiro WadaGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8137-9144
Hokkaido University · JPColgate University · USHokkaido University of Science · JPKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of highly complex vocal skill, like human language and bird songs, is underlain by learning. Vocal learning, even when occurring in adulthood, is thought to largely depend on a sensitive/critical period during postnatal development, and learned vocal patterns emerge gradually as the long-term consequence of vocal practice during this critical period. In this scenario, it is presumed that the effect of vocal practice is thus mainly limited by the intrinsic timing of age-dependent maturation factors that close the critical period and reduce neural plasticity. However, an alternative, as-yet untested hypothesis is that vocal practice itself, independently of age, regulates vocal learning plasticity. Here, we explicitly discriminate between the influences of age and vocal practice using a songbird model system. We prevented zebra finches from singing during the critical period of sensorimotor learning by reversible postural manipulation. This enabled to us to separate lifelong vocal experience from the effects of age. The singing-prevented birds produced juvenile-like immature song and retained sufficient ability to acquire a tutored song even at adulthood when allowed to sing freely. Genome-wide gene expression network analysis revealed that this adult vocal plasticity was accompanied by an intense induction of singing activity-dependent genes, similar to that observed in juvenile birds, rather than of age-dependent genes. The transcriptional changes of activity-dependent genes occurred in the vocal motor robust nucleus of the arcopallium (RA) projection neurons that play a critical role in the production of song phonology. These gene expression changes were accompanied by neuroanatomical changes: dendritic spine pruning in RA projection neurons. These results show that self-motivated practice itself changes the expression dynamics of activity-dependent genes associated with vocal learning plasticity and that this process is not tightly linked to age-dependent maturational factors.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalLearningAgingAnimalsDendritic SpinesMaleSongbirdsVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID30208028
PMCPMC6152990
OpenAlexW2892349904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.