Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30207864›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Automatic spike sorting for high-density microelectrode arrays.

Roland Diggelmann, Michele Fiscella, Andreas Hierlemann, Felix Franke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Neurodatascience: Past, Present, and Future.Data science in science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. AECuration: automated event curation for spike sorting.Journal of neural engineering · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Spike sorting with Kilosort4.Nature methods · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roland DiggelmannDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel , Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1819-0995
Michele FiscellaDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel , Switzerland.
Andreas HierlemannDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel , Switzerland.
Felix FrankeDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel , Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5550-1222

Funding

European Research Council 267351European Research Council 694829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-density microelectrode arrays can be used to record extracellular action potentials from hundreds to thousands of neurons simultaneously. Efficient spike sorters must be developed to cope with such large data volumes. Most existing spike sorting methods for single electrodes or small multielectrodes, however, suffer from the "curse of dimensionality" and cannot be directly applied to recordings with hundreds of electrodes. This holds particularly true for the standard reference spike sorting algorithm, principal component analysis-based feature extraction, followed by k-means or expectation maximization clustering, against which most spike sorters are evaluated. We present a spike sorting algorithm that circumvents the dimensionality problem by sorting local groups of electrodes independently with classical spike sorting approaches. It is scalable to any number of recording electrodes and well suited for parallel computing. The combination of data prewhitening before the principal component analysis-based extraction and a parameter-free clustering algorithm obviated the need for parameter adjustments. We evaluated its performance using surrogate data in which we systematically varied spike amplitudes and spike rates and that were generated by inserting template spikes into the voltage traces of real recordings. In a direct comparison, our algorithm could compete with existing state-of-the-art spike sorters in terms of sensitivity and precision, while parameter adjustment or manual cluster curation was not required. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present an automatic spike sorting algorithm that combines three strategies to scale classical spike sorting techniques for high-density microelectrode arrays: 1) splitting the recording electrodes into small groups and sorting them independently; 2) clustering a subset of spikes and classifying the rest to limit computation time; and 3) prewhitening the spike waveforms to enable the use of parameter-free clustering. Finally, we combined these strategies into an automatic spike sorter that is competitive with state-of-the-art spike sorters.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAction PotentialsAnimalsCricetinaeMesocricetusMicroarray AnalysisMicroelectrodesNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesHD-MEA surrogate datahigh-density microelectrode arrayprewhiteningspike sorting

Identifiers

PMID30207864
PMCPMC6314465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.