Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30207859›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Predicting responses to inhibitory synaptic input in substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons.

D V Simmons, M H Higgs, S Lebby, C J Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Propagation of Oscillations in the Indirect Pathway of the Basal Ganglia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Spontaneous Activity of the Local GABAergic Synaptic Network Causes Irregular Neuronal Firing in the External Globus Pallidus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D V SimmonsDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio , San Antonio, Texas.
M H HiggsDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio , San Antonio, Texas.
S LebbyDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio , San Antonio, Texas.
C J WilsonDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio , San Antonio, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9004-2145

Funding

Oscillations and Resonance in Basal Ganglia CircuitsR35NS097185 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI WILSON, CHARLES J · 2017 to 2024
$5.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The changes in firing probability produced by a synaptic input are usually visualized using the poststimulus time histogram (PSTH). It would be useful if postsynaptic firing patterns could be predicted from patterns of afferent synaptic activation, but attempts to predict the PSTH from synaptic potential waveforms using reasoning based on voltage trajectory and spike threshold have not been successful, especially for inhibitory inputs. We measured PSTHs for substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) neurons inhibited by optogenetic stimulation of striato-nigral inputs or by matching artificial inhibitory conductances applied by dynamic clamp. The PSTH was predicted by a model based on each SNr cell's phase-resetting curve (PRC). Optogenetic activation of striato-nigral input or artificial synaptic inhibition produced a PSTH consisting of an initial depression of firing followed by oscillatory increases and decreases repeating at the SNr cell's baseline firing rate. The phase resetting model produced PSTHs closely resembling the cell data, including the primary pause in firing and the oscillation. Key features of the PSTH, including the onset rate and duration of the initial inhibitory phase, and the subsequent increase in firing probability could be explained from the characteristic shape of the SNr cell's PRC. The rate of damping of the late oscillation was explained by the influence of asynchronous phase perturbations producing firing rate jitter and wander. Our results demonstrate the utility of phase-resetting models as a general method for predicting firing in spontaneously active neurons and their value in interpretation of the striato-nigral PSTH. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The coupling of patterned presynaptic input to sequences of postsynaptic firing is a Gordian knot, complicated by the multidimensionality of neuronal state and the diversity of potential initial states. Even so, it is fundamental for even the simplest understanding of network dynamics. We show that a simple phase-resetting model constructed from experimental measurements can explain and predict the sequence of spike rate changes following synaptic inhibition of an oscillating basal ganglia output neuron.

Indexed as

Neural InhibitionSynaptic PotentialsAnimalsBasal GangliaFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsOptogeneticsPars Reticulatabasal gangliadirect pathwayoscillationssubstantia nigrasynaptic response

Identifiers

PMID30207859
PMCPMC6295529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.