Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30207838›Full record

ReviewGut microbes2019

The rumen microbiome: a crucial consideration when optimising milk and meat production and nitrogen utilisation efficiency.

Chloe Matthews, Fiona Crispie, Eva Lewis, Michael Reid, Paul W O'Toole, Paul D Cotter

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 231 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
25.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 421 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chloe Matthewsa Food Biosciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre , Co. Cork , Ireland.
Fiona Crispiea Food Biosciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre , Co. Cork , Ireland.
Eva Lewisa Food Biosciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre , Co. Cork , Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9170-0226
Michael Reida Food Biosciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre , Co. Cork , Ireland.
Paul W O'Toolea Food Biosciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre , Co. Cork , Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5377-0824
Paul D Cottera Food Biosciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre , Co. Cork , Ireland.
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methane is generated in the foregut of all ruminant animals by the microorganisms present. Dietary manipulation is regarded as the most effective and most convenient way to reduce methane emissions (and in turn energy loss in the animal) and increase nitrogen utilization efficiency. This review examines the impact of diet on bovine rumen function and outlines what is known about the rumen microbiome. Our understanding of this area has increased significantly in recent years due to the application of omics technologies to determine microbial composition and functionality patterns in the rumen. This information can be combined with data on nutrition, rumen physiology, nitrogen excretion and/or methane emission to provide comprehensive insights into the relationship between rumen microbial activity, nitrogen utilisation efficiency and methane emission, with an ultimate view to the development of new and improved intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Food IndustryGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsCattleDietDietary ProteinsMetagenomicsMethaneNitrogenRumenDietary ProteinsMethaneNitrogenculture independentgenomicsmicrobiomeRumenshotgun

Identifiers

PMID30207838
PMCPMC6546327
OpenAlexW2892287249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.