Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30207828›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2018

Layers of regulation of cell-cycle gene expression in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Christina M Kelliher, Matthew W Foster, Francis C Motta, Anastasia Deckard, Erik J Soderblom, M Arthur Moseley, Steven B Haase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of the Cell-Cycle Clock Models: Biochemical or Transcriptional?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Building blocks are synthesized on demand during the yeast cell cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina M KelliherDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Matthew W FosterDuke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Durham, NC 27701.
Francis C MottaDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Anastasia DeckardDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Erik J SoderblomDuke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Durham, NC 27701.
M Arthur MoseleyDuke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Durham, NC 27701.
Steven B HaaseDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, transcription factors (TFs) regulate the periodic expression of many genes during the cell cycle, including gene products required for progression through cell-cycle events. Experimental evidence coupled with quantitative models suggests that a network of interconnected TFs is capable of regulating periodic genes over the cell cycle. Importantly, these dynamical models were built on transcriptomics data and assumed that TF protein levels and activity are directly correlated with mRNA abundance. To ask whether TF transcripts match protein expression levels as cells progress through the cell cycle, we applied a multiplexed targeted mass spectrometry approach (parallel reaction monitoring) to synchronized populations of cells. We found that protein expression of many TFs and cell-cycle regulators closely followed their respective mRNA transcript dynamics in cycling wild-type cells. Discordant mRNA/protein expression dynamics was also observed for a subset of cell-cycle TFs and for proteins targeted for degradation by E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes such as SCF (Skp1/Cul1/F-box) and APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome). We further profiled mutant cells lacking B-type cyclin/CDK activity ( clb1-6) where oscillations in ubiquitin ligase activity, cyclin/CDKs, and cell-cycle progression are halted. We found that a number of proteins were no longer periodically degraded in clb1-6 mutants compared with wild type, highlighting the importance of posttranscriptional regulation. Finally, the TF complexes responsible for activating G1/S transcription (SBF and MBF) were more constitutively expressed at the protein level than at periodic mRNA expression levels in both wild-type and mutant cells. This comprehensive investigation of cell-cycle regulators reveals that multiple layers of regulation (transcription, protein stability, and proteasome targeting) affect protein expression dynamics during the cell cycle.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsMass SpectrometryModels, BiologicalMutationProteomeReproducibility of ResultsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsTranscriptomeCell Cycle ProteinsProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30207828
PMCPMC6249835
OpenAlexW2889711675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.