Population Health Science as the Basic Science of Public Health: A Public Health of Consequence, October 2018.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Population Health and Trauma-Informed Practice: Implications for Programs, Systems, and Policies.American journal of community psychology · 2019
   Article
2. When Population Health Science Intersects With Pressing Cultural Issues: A Public Health of Consequence, March 2019.American journal of public health · 2019
   Article
3. Testing the Duke Population Health Profile (Duke-PH) in a Sample of Community Health Center Patients.Frontiers in public health · 2019
   Article
4. Putting Action into Population Health Science: Primary Care Interventions to Address Social Determinants of Health.Journal of environment and health sciences · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate.2018

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as