Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30207748›Full record

ArticleDiabetes technology & therapeutics2018

Improved Postprandial Glucose with Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Compared with Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections: The STAT Study.

Halis Kaan Akturk, Janet K Snell-Bergeon, Amanda Rewers, Leslie J Klaff, Bruce W Bode, Anne L Peters, Timothy S Bailey, Satish K Garg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03143816 (Study Comparing Prandial Insulin Aspart vs. Technosphere Insulin in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03143816 phase4completednot on this map

Study Comparing Prandial Insulin Aspart vs. Technosphere Insulin in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections: Investigator-Initiated A Real-life Pilot Study-STAT Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2017 to 2018Enrolled60ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1ArmsTechnosphere insulin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Hypoglycaemia is reduced with use of inhaled TechnosphereDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2020
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled TechnosphereDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  10. Revolutionizing Diabetes Care: From Tech to Therapeutics.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Prandial Insulins: A Person-Centered Choice.Current diabetes reports · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Exploring the Burden of Mealtime Insulin Dosing in Adults and Children With Type 1 Diabetes.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2021
    Article
  18. Diabetes Technology Meeting 2020.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Evolution of Insulin Delivery Devices: From Syringes, Pens, and Pumps to DIY Artificial Pancreas.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Halis Kaan Akturk1 Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora, Colorado.
Janet K Snell-Bergeon1 Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora, Colorado.
Amanda Rewers1 Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora, Colorado.
Leslie J Klaff2 Rainier Clinical Research Center , Renton, Washington.
Bruce W Bode3 Atlanta Diabetes Associates , Atlanta, Georgia .
Anne L Peters4 Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California.
Timothy S Bailey5 AMCR Institute , Escondido, California.
Satish K Garg1 Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora, Colorado.
University of Colorado Denver · USAMCR Institute · USAtlanta Diabetes Associates · USRainier Clinical Research Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of therapies have generally targeted fasting glucose control, and current mealtime insulin therapies have longer time action profiles than that of endogenously secreted insulin. The primary purpose of this study was to assess both glucose time-in-range (TIR: 70-180 mg/dL) and postprandial glucose excursions (PPGE) in 1-4 h using a real-time continuous glucose monitor (CGM) with Technosphere insulin (TI) versus insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) on multiple daily injections (MDI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis pilot, investigator-led, collaborative, open-label, multicenter, clinical research trial enrolled 60 patients with T1DM with HbA1c levels ≥6.5% and ≤10%. Individuals were randomized to treatment with titrated TI (n = 26) or titrated insulin aspart (n = 34), stratified by baseline HbA1c levels (≤8% or >8%). All were required to wear a real-time CGM throughout the trial. All patients in the TI group were advised to take supplemental inhalations at 1 and 2 h after meals if indicated based on postprandial glucose (PPG) values. The coprimary outcomes were assessed both in the full intent-to-treat population and in those individuals randomized to TI who were compliant with supplemental doses ≥90% of the time (n = 15). The CGM data were analyzed using linear regression models.

resultsOverall, those treated with TI versus aspart achieved comparable TIR, but less time spent in hypoglycemia (<60 and <50 mg/dL, both P < 0.05). In the TI-compliant group (n = 15), TIR was significantly greater (62.5% ± 2.6% vs. 53.8% ± 1.7%, P = 0.009) and time in hyperglycemia >180 mg/dL was lower (34.2% ± 2.7% vs. 41.0% ± 1.7%, P = 0.045) as compared with the aspart group. PPG was also significantly lower in the TI cohort at 60 and 90 min postmeal, and PPGE were lower in the TI-compliant group as compared with the aspart group over 1-4-h postmeal (P < 0.05). In addition, there was weight gain in the aspart group compared with weight loss in the TI group (P = 0.006) despite higher prandial TI insulin dose.

conclusionsWe conclude that using TI appropriately at mealtimes with supplemental dosing improves prandial glucose (TIR and 1-4 h) control without any increase in time in hypoglycemia or weight gain in patients with T1DM on MDI. The study results support a larger study using a treat-to-target design to confirm these findings. Clinical trial reg. no. NCT03143816, clinicaltrials.gov .

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Drug Delivery SystemsFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInjectionsInsulinInsulin AspartMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin AspartContinuous glucose monitoring.Insulin aspartPostprandial hyperglycemiaTechnosphere InsulinTime in rangeType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30207748
PMCPMC6161328
OpenAlexW2891930321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.