Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30207105›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2018

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for elderly cervical cancer patients with positive margins, lymph nodes, or parametrial invasion.

Taylor R Cushman, Waqar Haque, Hari Menon, Chad G Rusthoven, E Brian Butler, Bin S Teh, Vivek Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Taylor R CushmanUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4513-5537
Waqar HaqueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9364-2966
Hari MenonUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5684-1405
Chad G RusthovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2372-4154
E Brian ButlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8363-0061
Bin S TehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-9444
Vivek VermaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. vivek333@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-6023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWomen with cervical cancer (CC) found to have positive surgical margins, positive lymph nodes, and/or parametrial invasion receive a survival benefit from postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs. radiation therapy (RT) alone. However, older women may not benefit to the same extent, as they are at increased risk of death from non-oncologic causes as well as toxicities from oncologic treatments. This study sought to evaluate whether there was a survival benefit of CRT over RT in elderly patients with cervical cancer.

methodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for patients ≥70 years old with newly diagnosed IA2, IB, or IIA CC and positive margins, parametrial invasion, and/or positive nodes on surgical resection. Statistics included logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling analyses.

resultsAltogether, 166 patients met inclusion criteria; 62 (37%) underwent postoperative RT and 104 (63%) underwent postoperative CRT. Younger patients and those living in areas of higher income were less likely to receive CRT, while parametrial invasion and nodal involvement were associated with an increased likelihood (p<0.05 for all). There were no OS differences by treatment type. Subgroup analysis by number of risk factors, as well as each of the 3 risk factors separately, also did not reveal any OS differences between cohorts.

conclusionIn the largest such study to date, older women with postoperative risk factor(s) receiving RT alone experienced similar survival as those undergoing CRT. Although causation is not implied, careful patient selection is paramount to balance treatment-related toxicity risks with theoretical outcome benefits.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantMargins of ExcisionRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPeritoneumRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical CancerChemotherapyElderlyGeriatricsRadiation Therapy

Identifiers

PMID30207105
PMCPMC6189436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.