Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30207102›Full record

ReviewJournal of gynecologic oncology2018

Current landscape and future perspective of sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer.

Giorgio Bogani, Francesco Raspagliesi, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Andrea Mariani

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Endometrial Cancer Update 2018.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giorgio BoganiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy. giorgio.bogani@istitutotumori.mi.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-8569
Francesco RaspagliesiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-7794
Umberto Leone Roberti MaggioreDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3744-2668
Andrea MarianiDepartment of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7117-8269
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) represents the most common gynecological neoplasm in developed countries. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for EC. Although EC is characterized by a high prevalence several features regarding its management are still unclear. In particular the execution of lymphadenectomy is controversial. The recent introduction of sentinel node mapping represents the mid-way between the execution and omission of node dissection in EC patients. In the present review we discuss the emerging role of sentinel node mapping in EC. In addition, we discussed how type of tracers utilized and site of injection impacted on sentinel node detection rates. Future perspective regarding EC management are also discussed.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionColoring AgentsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenLymphatic MetastasisMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingRobotic Surgical ProceduresSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyColoring AgentsIndocyanine GreenEndometrial NeoplasmsLaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionRobotic Surgical ProceduresSentinel Lymph Node

Identifiers

PMID30207102
PMCPMC6189438
OpenAlexW2888032263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.