ArticleThe Journal of physiology2018
Complex and spatially segregated auditory inputs of the mouse superior colliculus.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of Auditory Responsive Neurons in the Mouse Superior Colliculus to White Noise and Frequency-Restricted Sounds.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Pathways from the Superior Colliculus to the Basal Ganglia.Current neuropharmacology · 2024Review
- Cortical-subcortical interactions in goal-directed behavior.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- The Superior Colliculus: Cell Types, Connectivity, and Behavior.Neuroscience bulletin · 2022Review
- Structural Connectivity of Human Inferior Colliculus Subdivisions UsingFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Functional Organisation of the Mouse Superior Colliculus.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022Review
- Visually guided saccades and acoustic distractors: no evidence for the remote distractor effect or global effect.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Perineuronal nets and subtypes of GABAergic cells differentiate auditory and multisensory nuclei in the intercollicular area of the midbrain.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsAlthough the visual circuits in the superior colliculus (SC) have been thoroughly examined, the auditory circuits lack equivalent scrutiny. SC neurons receiving auditory inputs in mice were characterized and three distinguishable types of neurons were found. The auditory pathways from external nuclei of the inferior colliculus (IC) were characterized, and a novel direct inhibitory connection and an excitation that drives feed-forward inhibitory circuits within the SC were found. The direct excitatory and inhibitory inputs exhibited distinct arbourization patterns in the SC. These findings suggest functional differences between excitatory and inhibitory sensory information that targets the auditory SC. ABSTRACT: The superior colliculus (SC) is a midbrain structure that integrates auditory, somatosensory and visual inputs to drive orientation movements. While much is known about how visual information is processed in the superficial layers of the SC, little is known about the SC circuits in the deep layers that process auditory inputs. We therefore characterized intrinsic neuronal properties in the auditory-recipient layer of the SC (stratum griseum profundum; SGP) and confirmed three electrophysiologically defined clusters of neurons, consistent with literature from other SC layers. To determine the types of inputs to the SGP, we expressed Channelrhodopsin-2 in the nucleus of the brachium of the inferior colliculus (nBIC) and external cortex of the inferior colliculus (ECIC) and optically stimulated these pathways while recording from SGP neurons. Probing the connections in this manner, we described a monosynaptic excitation that additionally drives feed-forward inhibition via circuits intrinsic to the SC. Moreover, we found a profound long-range monosynaptic inhibition in 100% of recorded SGP neurons, a surprising finding considering that only about 15% of SGP-projecting neurons in the nBIC/ECIC are inhibitory. Furthermore, we found spatial differences in the cell body locations as well as axon trajectories between the monosynaptic excitatory and inhibitory inputs, suggesting that these inputs may be functionally distinct. Taking this together with recent anatomical evidence suggesting an auditory excitation from the nBIC and a GABAergic multimodal inhibition from the ECIC, we propose that sensory integration in the SGP is more multifaceted than previously thought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.