Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206778›Full record

ReviewPrimates; journal of primatology2019

Mechanisms of network evolution: a focus on socioecological factors, intermediary mechanisms, and selection pressures.

Cédric Sueur, Valéria Romano, Sebastian Sosa, Ivan Puga-Gonzalez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Primates; journal of primatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Far-reaching consequences of trait preferences for animal social network structure and function.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cédric SueurUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC, UMR 7178, Strasbourg, France. cedric.sueur@iphc.cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-2739
Valéria RomanoKyoto University Primate Research Institute, Inuyama, Japan.
Sebastian SosaPrimates and Evolution Anthropology Laboratory, Anthropology Department, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ivan Puga-GonzalezInstitute for Religion, Philosophy and History, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-15-CE36-0005-01Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique PICS 7455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since group-living animals are embedded in a network of social interactions, socioecological factors may not only affect individual behavioral strategies but also the patterning of group-level social interactions, i.e., the network structure. These co-variations between socioecological factors, individual behavior, and group-level structure are important to study since ecological factors may strongly influence animal health outcomes and reproductive success. Besides factors such as social information and/or infectious agents, with far-reaching individual fitness consequences, seem independent of individuals' own social interactions but directly affected by the topology of the social network. This paper reviews how socio-ecological pressures, i.e., causal factors (food distribution, predation, and infectious agent risk), via intermediary mechanisms (stress, information sharing, and mating system), may affect individual social behavior and consequently, social network topology. We also discuss how evolutionary driving forces, genetic (i.e., genes) and cultural (i.e., learned behavior) selection, may result in a specific composition of individuals' social strategies that produce network topologies that might be optimized to specific socio-ecological conditions. We conclude that studies focusing on whether and how well networks resist changing conditions might provide a better understanding of the rules underlying individual behavior, which in turn influences network topology-a process we have called network evolution. Evolutionary processes may favor a group phenotypic composition, thus a network topology. This has been referred to as a "collective social niche construction".

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalBiological EvolutionReproductionSocial BehaviorAnimalsPrimatesSelection, GeneticCultural brain hypothesisFitnessGroup-living trade-off, cultural evolutionMulti-level selectionSociality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.