ReviewPrimates; journal of primatology2019
Mechanisms of network evolution: a focus on socioecological factors, intermediary mechanisms, and selection pressures.
Review in Primates; journal of primatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Game theory elucidates how competitive dynamics mediate animal social networks.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Individualized social niches in animals: Theoretical clarifications and processes of niche change.Bioscience · 2024Review
- The role of social attraction and social avoidance in shaping modular networks.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- A Data-Driven Simulation of the Trophallactic Network and Intranidal Food Flow Dissemination in Ants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Group composition of individual personalities alters social network structure in experimental populations of forked fungus beetles.Biology letters · 2022Article
- Review
- Selection on heritable social network positions is context-dependent in Drosophila melanogaster.Nature communications · 2021Article
- A multilevel analytical framework for studying cultural evolution in prehistoric hunter-gatherer societies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020Review
- Editorial: Social networks analyses in primates, a multilevel perspective.Primates; journal of primatology · 2019Article
- Far-reaching consequences of trait preferences for animal social network structure and function.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since group-living animals are embedded in a network of social interactions, socioecological factors may not only affect individual behavioral strategies but also the patterning of group-level social interactions, i.e., the network structure. These co-variations between socioecological factors, individual behavior, and group-level structure are important to study since ecological factors may strongly influence animal health outcomes and reproductive success. Besides factors such as social information and/or infectious agents, with far-reaching individual fitness consequences, seem independent of individuals' own social interactions but directly affected by the topology of the social network. This paper reviews how socio-ecological pressures, i.e., causal factors (food distribution, predation, and infectious agent risk), via intermediary mechanisms (stress, information sharing, and mating system), may affect individual social behavior and consequently, social network topology. We also discuss how evolutionary driving forces, genetic (i.e., genes) and cultural (i.e., learned behavior) selection, may result in a specific composition of individuals' social strategies that produce network topologies that might be optimized to specific socio-ecological conditions. We conclude that studies focusing on whether and how well networks resist changing conditions might provide a better understanding of the rules underlying individual behavior, which in turn influences network topology-a process we have called network evolution. Evolutionary processes may favor a group phenotypic composition, thus a network topology. This has been referred to as a "collective social niche construction".
Indexed as
Identifiers
30206778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.