Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206742›Full record

Observational studyZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2019

[Validation of the Geriatric Check in a cohort of hospitalized neurological patients].

Markus A Hobert, Felix P Bernhard, Kristina Bettecken, Jennifer Sartor, Walter Maetzler, Michael Jamour

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Markus A HobertZentrum für Neurologie und Hertie-Institut für Klinische Hirnforschung, Abteilung für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland. Markus.Hobert@uksh.de.
Felix P BernhardZentrum für Neurologie und Hertie-Institut für Klinische Hirnforschung, Abteilung für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Kristina BetteckenZentrum für Neurologie und Hertie-Institut für Klinische Hirnforschung, Abteilung für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Jennifer SartorZentrum für Neurologie und Hertie-Institut für Klinische Hirnforschung, Abteilung für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Walter MaetzlerZentrum für Neurologie und Hertie-Institut für Klinische Hirnforschung, Abteilung für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Michael JamourGeriatrische Rehabilitationsklinik Ehingen, Ehingen, Deutschland.
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Geriatrie-Check was developed as a screening tool for the identification of older patients with geriatric treatment requirements in hospitals. It was recommended by the Baden-Wuerttemberg Hospitals Association for routine use in hospitals in 2014 although no published validation studies are available. The test takes 3-5 min.

aimValidation of the Geriatrie-Check in a prospective cohort of hospitalized neurological patients with and without geriatric characteristics.

methodsIn this prospective cross-sectional observational study at the University Hospital Tübingen, Germany the Geriatrie-Check was compared with a comprehensive geriatric assessment in 107 neurological inpatients aged 70 years and older (41% women, mean age 76.7 years).

resultsThe Geriatrie-Check classified 61 patients (57%) as geriatric patients. These patients with a positive result in the Geriatrie-Check had a higher percentage of frailty (according to Fried et al.), higher values in the Gérontopôle frailty screening tool, higher values in the geriatric screening according to Lachs et el., slower gait speed, lower grip force, needed longer for the timed up-and-go test, had a greater fear of falling in the Falls Efficacy Scale - International, lower scores in the Mini Mental State Examination, needed more time to perform the Trail Making Test A and B, had higher values in the Beck's Depressions Inventar II and lower values in the visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D. A higher percentage of patients took more than five different drugs. INTERPRETATION AND

conclusionThe Geriatrie-Check has been shown to be a useful and valid tool for the identification of geriatric inpatients in neurological wards due to the good agreement with the results of the geriatric assessment.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsGeriatric AssessmentAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleProspective StudiesGeriatric assessmentGeriatric patientsNeurogeriatricsScreening toolValidation

Identifiers

PMID30206742
OpenAlexW2892054366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.