Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206730›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2018

Fluid Management in Acute Brain Injury.

Sandra Rossi, Edoardo Picetti, Tommaso Zoerle, Marco Carbonara, Elisa R Zanier, Nino Stocchetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Hydroelectrolytic syndromes in neuroanesthesia and neurocritical care.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Preoperative intravenous mannitol administration and its rationale before cataract surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. [Albumin in traumatic brain injury-osmolarity is what matters!]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022
    Article
  15. Positive fluid balance is associated with death and severity of brain injury in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Observational
  16. Review
  17. [Clinical efficacy of restrictive fluid management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra RossiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy. sarossi@ao.pr.it.
Edoardo PicettiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy.
Tommaso ZoerleNeuro ICU, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Marco CarbonaraNeuro ICU, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Elisa R ZanierDepartment of Neuroscience, Laboratory of Acute Brain Injury and Therapeutic Strategies, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Nino StocchettiNeuro ICU, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITOspedale di Parma · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewThe aims of fluid management in acute brain injury are to preserve or restore physiology and guarantee appropriate tissue perfusion, avoiding potential iatrogenic effects. We reviewed the literature, focusing on the clinical implications of the selected papers. Our purposes were to summarize the principles regulating the distribution of water between the intracellular, interstitial, and plasma compartments in the normal and the injured brain, and to clarify how these principles could guide fluid administration, with special reference to intracranial pressure control. RECENT

findingsAlthough a considerable amount of research has been published on this topic and in general on fluid management in acute illness, the quality of the evidence tends to vary. Intravascular volume management should aim for euvolemia. There is evidence of harm with aggressive administration of fluid aimed at achieving hypervolemia in cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Isotonic crystalloids should be the preferred agents for volume replacement, while colloids, glucose-containing hypotonic solutions, and other hypotonic solutions or albumin should be avoided. Osmotherapy seems to be effective in intracranial hypertension management; however, there is no clear evidence regarding the superiority of hypertonic saline over mannitol. Fluid therapy plays an important role in the management of acute brain injury patients. However, fluids are a double-edged weapon because of the potential risk of hyper-hydration, hypo- or hyper-osmolar conditions, which may unfavorably affect the clinical course and the outcome.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementBrain InjuriesFluid TherapyHumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaline Solution, HypertonicSubarachnoid HemorrhageSaline Solution, HypertonicBrain injuryFluid therapyHypertonic salineMannitolSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID30206730
OpenAlexW2891776735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.