ReviewCurrent urology reports2018
Use of MR Urography in Pediatric Patients.
Review in Current urology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric magnetic resonance urography from patient preparation to post-processing: basics and controversies.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Magnetic resonance urography (MRU): technique mastery and illustrative case reviews.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Urogenital anomalies in children with anorectal malformations: a single institution observational study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance urography: a practical approach to preparation, protocol and interpretation.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Urography in Children-Tips and Pitfalls.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Radiological and surgical correlation of pelviureteric junction obstruction in positional anomalies of the kidney in children.Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
- Imaging of congenital genitourinary anomalies.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Quantitative renal magnetic resonance imaging: magnetic resonance urography.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- The Emerging Role of MR Urography in Imaging Megaureters in Children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Clinical Management of Children with a Congenital Solitary Functioning Kidney: Overview and Recommendations.European urology open science · 2021Review
- Imaging protocols for renal multiparametric MRI and MR urography: results of a consensus conference from the French Society of Genitourinary Imaging.European radiology · 2020Article
- Magnetic Resonance Urogram in Pediatric Urology: a Comprehensive Review of Applications and Advances.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn this article, we describe the basics of how magnetic resonance urography (MRU) is performed in the pediatric population as well as the common indications and relative performance compared to standard imaging modalities. RECENT
findingsAlthough MRU is still largely performed in major academic or specialty imaging centers, more and more applications in the pediatric setting have been described in the literature. MRU is a comprehensive imaging modality for evaluating multiple pediatric urologic conditions combining excellent anatomic detail with functional information previously only available via renal scintigraphy. While generally still reserved for problem solving, MRU should be considered for some conditions as an early imaging technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.