Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206653›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2018

[Identification of diagnostic tumour markers and therapeutic targets in testicular tumours].

F Bremmer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

F BremmerInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. felix.bremmer@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, tumour classification has been expanded due to immunohistochemical and molecular-pathological analyses due to corresponding patterns/profiles of protein and gene expression. The latter analyses often include growth factors and their ligands, intracellular signalling pathways, DNA-binding proteins, and oncogenes and suppressor genes, thus functionally including primarily the regulation of growth including angiogenesis and apoptosis as well as the induction of metastases to adhesion and migration disorders. Based on observations that testicular tumours often show microcalcifications, possibly due to impaired calcium metabolism, we focused on calcium-dependent transmembrane proteins, particularly cadherins, in the search for new tumour markers and therapeutic targets. N‑cadherin is expressed differently in the various subtypes of germ cell tumours and is useful in N‑cadherin-positive germ cell tumours as a novel therapeutic targeting structure, particularly in cisplatin resistance, due to functional analysis. In the tumours of the sex cord stroma beta-catenin and the transcription factor SOX-9 give a clear classification of these tumours. Thus, morphological investigations prove to be pilot experiments to purposefully narrow the spectrum of functionally important proteins and thus to establish promising new differential diagnostic markers or target structures.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalTesticular Neoplasmsbeta CateninBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsHumansMalebeta CateninBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsDNA-Binding ProteinsBeta-cateninCadherinSOX9Testicular germ cell tumorTransmembrane proteins

Identifiers

PMID30206653
OpenAlexW2891139228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.