ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2018
Manganese-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Cancers.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, we investigated the diagnostic performance of manganese (Mn)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI) in colorectal cancer (CRC). The ability of CRC cell lines SW620 and SW480 to uptake Mn was evaluated and compared with a normal colon cell using MEMRI. Subcutaneous xenografts in nude mice underwent MRI examination at tumor sizes of 5, 10, and 15 mm. Contrast enhancement was compared between gadolinium (Gd)- and Mn-enhanced MRI. SW620 and SW480 cell lines took up more Mn
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.