Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206524›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2018

The rate of reply and nature of responses to suicide-related posts on Twitter.

Bridianne O'Dea, Melinda R Achilles, Mark E Larsen, Philip J Batterham, Alison L Calear, Helen Christensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. It's quality and quantity: the effect of the amount of comments on online suicidal posts.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Responses to Live-Stream Suicides on Social Media.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bridianne O'DeaBlack Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Melinda R AchillesBlack Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Mark E LarsenBlack Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social media platform Twitter has been used by individuals to communicate suicidal thoughts and intentions. Currently, the nature and rate of reply to this type of Twitter content is unknown. This brief report aimed to understand how Twitter users respond to suicide-related content as compared to non-suicide related content. Using a dataset of suicide and non-suicide related posts, replies, retweets and likes were analysed and compared. The content of the first replies to suicide-related posts were also reviewed. When compared to non-suicide related posts, those that were suicide-related received a significantly greater number of replies, with fewer retweets and likes. The rate of reply to the suicide-related posts was also significantly faster than that of the non-suicide related posts, with the average reply occurring within 1 h. Thematic analysis revealed that 62% of the first replies to suicidal posts were of a potentially helpful nature (e.g. discouraging suicide, caring, or clarifying), while 23% were dismissive or encouraging of the suicide. These findings indicate that Twitter users respond differently to suicidal content. Further research is needed to determine the effects of the replies on suicidal intentions or ideations, and whether this platform can be used to intervene, increase help-seeking, or provide anti-stigma campaigns.

Indexed as

Mental healthPreventionSocial mediaSuicideTwitter

Identifiers

PMID30206524
PMCPMC6112104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.