Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206482›Full record

ReviewCardiac failure review2018

Heart-brain Interactions in Heart Failure.

Nadja Scherbakov, Wolfram Doehner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiac failure review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Atherosclerotic features in patients with heart failure.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with heart failure: the Italian registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Evaluated by 4D Flow MRI Across the Adult Lifespan.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cognitive Impairment in Acute Heart Failure: Narrative Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadja ScherbakovCentre for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Germany.
Wolfram DoehnerCentre for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Germany.
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a complex disease with a growing incidence worldwide. HF is accompanied by a wide range of conditions which affect disease progression, functional performance and contribute to growing healthcare costs. The interactions between a failing myocardium and altered cerebral functions contribute to the symptoms experienced by patients with HF, affecting many comorbidities and causing a poor prognosis. This article provides a condensed version of the 2018 position paper from the Study Group on Heart and Brain Interaction of the Heart Failure Association. It addresses the reciprocal impact on HF of several pathological brain conditions, including acute and chronic low perfusion of the brain, and impairment of higher cortical and brain stem functions. Treatment-related interactions - medical, interventional and device-related - are also discussed.

Indexed as

cerebral perfusioncognitive impairmentHeart failureneuro-cardiac reflexes

Identifiers

PMID30206482
PMCPMC6125712
OpenAlexW2888336514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.