Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30206311›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2019

Trends in the characteristics of human functional genomic data on the gene expression omnibus, 2001-2017.

Daniel D Liu, Lanjing Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Toward the Best Generalizable Performance of Machine Learning in Modeling Omic and Clinical Data.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Challenges and Opportunities of Translational Pathology.Journal of clinical and translational pathology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Performance and efficiency of machine learning algorithms for analyzing rectangular biomedical data.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances in the Clinical Application of High-throughput Proteomics.Exploratory research and hypothesis in medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel D LiuDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Lanjing ZhangDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center of Princeton, Plainsboro, NJ, 08536, USA. lanjing.zhang@rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5436-887X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gene expression omnibus (GEO) is the world's largest public repository of functional genomic data. Despite its broad use in secondary genomic analyses, the temporal trends in the characteristics of genomic data on GEO, including experimental procedures, geographic origin, funder(s), and related disease, have not been examined. We identified 75,376 Series deposited to the GEO during 2001-2017 and built a database of all human genomic data (39,076 Series, 51.8% of all Series). Using the associated publications, we obtained funding information and identified the related disease area. Of the Series with classified disease areas, the two most common were cancer (n = 12,688, 32.5%) and immunologic diseases (n = 2,393, 6.1%), while the percentages of all other disease areas were below 5%, including neurological diseases (n = 1733, 4.4%), infectious diseases (n = 1225, 3.1%), diabetes (n = 828, 2.1%), and cardiovascular diseases (n = 299, 0.8%). In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the use of high-throughput sequencing (HTS), protein array and multiple-platform technologies, as well as in the proportion of North American deposits. Compared to those from other regions, North American deposits appeared to lead the shift from array-based to HTS technologies (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 3.39, 3.23-3.55, P = 9.40E-323), and were less likely to focus on a major disease area (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.61-0.67, P = 5.02E-107), suggesting a greater emphasis on basic science in North America. Furthermore, the Series utilizing HTS were less likely to be disease-classified compared to other technologies (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.37-0.41, P = 1.00E-322), suggesting a preferential use or adoption of HTS in basic science settings. Finally, funding from the NHGRI, NCI, NIEHS, and NCCR resulted in a higher number of GEO Series per grant than other NIH institutes, demonstrating different preferences on genomic studies among awardees of NIH institutes. Our findings demonstrate geographic, technological, and funding disparities in the trends of GEO deposit characteristics.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetadata

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.